» Articles » PMID: 14527942

Hemodynamics of Orthostatic Intolerance: Implications for Gender Differences

Overview
Date 2003 Oct 7
PMID 14527942
Citations 75
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Women have a greater incidence of orthostatic intolerance than men. We hypothesized that this difference is related to hemodynamic effects on regulation of cardiac filling rather than to reduced responsiveness of vascular resistance during orthostatic stress. We constructed Frank-Starling curves from pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), stroke volume (SV), and stroke index (SI) during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) and saline infusion in 10 healthy young women and 13 men. Orthostatic tolerance was determined by progressive LBNP to presyncope. LBNP tolerance was significantly lower in women than in men (626.8 +/- 55.0 vs. 927.7 +/- 53.0 mmHg x min, P < 0.01). Women had steeper maximal slopes of Starling curves than men whether expressed as SV (12.5 +/- 2.0 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.5 ml/mmHg, P < 0.05) or normalized as SI (6.31 +/- 0.8 vs. 4.29 +/- 0.6 ml.m-2.mmHg-1, P < 0.05). During progressive LBNP, PCWP dropped quickly at low levels, and reached a plateau at high levels of LBNP near presyncope in all subjects. SV was 35% and SI was 29% lower in women at presyncope (both P < 0.05). Coincident with the smaller SV, women had higher heart rates but similar mean arterial pressures compared with men at presyncope. Vascular resistance and plasma norepinephrine concentration were similar between genders. We conclude that lower orthostatic tolerance in women is associated with decreased cardiac filling rather than reduced responsiveness of vascular resistance during orthostatic challenges. Thus cardiac mechanics and Frank-Starling relationship may be important mechanisms underlying the gender difference in orthostatic tolerance.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for vasovagal reactions in blood donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wu Y, Qi H, Di Angelantonio E, Kaptoge S, Wood A, Kim L Transfusion. 2024; 65(1):211-223.

PMID: 39587929 PMC: 11747113. DOI: 10.1111/trf.18078.


Novel Mechanisms of Postural Hyperventilation in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: Toward Discovery of Terra Incognita.

Zafeiropoulos S, Stavrakis S JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2024; 9(8):954-955.

PMID: 39297132 PMC: 11405797. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2024.05.010.


Modeling the impact of thoracic pressure on intracranial pressure.

Munster D, Lewandowski B, Nelson E, Prabhu R, Myers Jr J NPJ Microgravity. 2024; 10(1):46.

PMID: 38600142 PMC: 11006658. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-024-00385-5.


Sex Differences in Sympathetic Responses to Lower-Body Negative Pressure.

Jarrard C, Watso J, Atkins W, McKenna Z, Foster J, Huang M Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024; 56(6):1056-1065.

PMID: 38233995 PMC: 11187698. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003392.


Changes in Blood Pressure Variability in Children with Postural Tachycardia Syndrome.

Gu S, Wang S, Wang Y, Zhang J, Cai H, Zou R Children (Basel). 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37508741 PMC: 10378093. DOI: 10.3390/children10071244.