» Articles » PMID: 14507299

Respiratory Snorkel and Valve System for Breath-by-breath Gas Analysis in Swimming

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2003 Sep 26
PMID 14507299
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to compare a standard facemask (CM) and a newly modified swimming snorkel and valve system (SV) for breath-by-breath (BxB) gas analysis (K4 b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy), and to validate the system under controlled laboratory conditions before being used in swimming. Nine healthy males performed two bouts of a stepwise exercise on an electrically braked stationary bicycle on separate days. Ventilatory and gas exchange parameters were analyzed using the same BxB portable system, with subjects breathing alternatively through the two different valves. Agreement between both methods was evaluated by Passing-Bablok regression analysis. The gas exchange values measured using the SV were highly correlated with those obtained using the CM (R2 values >0.9). However, differences existed between the two series of measurements so that most ventilatory and gas exchange parameters were lower (3-7%) with the SV. The error when using the SV device was mainly systematic along the whole range of measurement. Accordingly, linear regression equations were developed to further improve the accuracy of the measures when using the SV. Therefore, the modified respiratory SV system can be considered as a valid device for collecting expired gas for BxB analysis, comparable to the standard facemask, with the advantage of being suitable for measurements during swimming.

Citing Articles

Stroke and physiological relationships during the incremental front crawl test: outcomes for planning and pacing aerobic training.

Almeida T, Espada M, Massini D, Macedo A, Castro E, Ferreira C Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1241948.

PMID: 37645566 PMC: 10460968. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1241948.


Which of the Physiological vs. Critical Speed Is a Determinant of Modern Pentathlon 200 m Front Crawl Swimming Performance: The Influence of Protocol and Ergometer vs. Swimming Pool Conditions.

Demarie S, Chirico E, Billat V Sports (Basel). 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36548498 PMC: 9787823. DOI: 10.3390/sports10120201.


[Formula: see text] kinetics and energy contribution in simulated maximal performance during short and middle distance-trials in swimming.

Almeida T, Pessoa Filho D, Espada M, Reis J, Simionato A, Siqueira L Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020; 120(5):1097-1109.

PMID: 32212025 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04348-y.


The energy cost of swimming and its determinants.

Zamparo P, Cortesi M, Gatta G Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019; 120(1):41-66.

PMID: 31807901 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04270-y.


The oxygen uptake slow component at submaximal intensities in breaststroke swimming.

Oliveira D, Goncalves L, Reis A, Fernandes R, Garrido N, Reis V J Hum Kinet. 2017; 51:165-173.

PMID: 28149379 PMC: 5260559. DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0179.