» Articles » PMID: 1446447

In Vitro Bone-cell Response to a Capacitively Coupled Electrical Field. The Role of Field Strength, Pulse Pattern, and Duty Cycle

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1992 Dec 1
PMID 1446447
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Newborn rat calvarial bone cells were grown to confluence and subjected to a matrix of sine wave 60-kHz capacitively coupled electrical signals of various field strengths, pulse-burst patterns, and duty cycles. Both [3H] thymidine incorporation into DNA and alkaline phosphatase activity were evaluated in field strengths ranging from 0.0001 to 20 mV/cm, with pulse-burst patterns ranging from continuous to 5 milliseconds ON/495 milliseconds OFF, with daily duty cycles ranging from 0.25% to 25%. A significant increase in proliferation occurred in field strengths of 0.1, 1, and 20 mV/cm when the signal was applied continuously for six hours. Significant proliferation also occurred when the 20-mV/cm field was pulsed for six hours at 5 milliseconds ON/495 milliseconds OFF and at 5 milliseconds ON/245 milliseconds OFF. No change in alkaline phosphatase activity occurred in the 20-mV/cm field with any signal. At 1 mV/cm, there was a significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity in the continuous signal and in the 5 milliseconds ON/62 milliseconds OFF signal; in the lower fields evaluated, there was an actual decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity with some of the signals. The field strength plays a dominant role in determining the bone-cell's proliferative response, and to a lesser extent the alkaline phosphatase activity response, to a capacitively coupled electric field. The pulse configuration and the duty cycle are also important, but only if the proper field strength is being applied to the cell.

Citing Articles

Enhancing cell motility via non-contact capacitively coupled electrostatic field.

Zironi I, Cramer T, Fuschi A, Cioni M, Guerra G, Giuliani G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28085.

PMID: 39543219 PMC: 11564694. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77384-9.


Electrical stimulation for cartilage tissue engineering - A critical review from an engineer's perspective.

Zimmermann J, Farooqi A, van Rienen U Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38112.

PMID: 39416819 PMC: 11481755. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38112.


: an open-source 3D printable perfusion bioreactor and numerical model-based design strategy for tissue engineering.

Meneses J, Fernandes S, Silva J, Ferreira F, Alves N, Pascoal-Faria P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 11:1308096.

PMID: 38162184 PMC: 10757336. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1308096.


Electrical Stimulation of Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on O Plasma-Treated ITO Glass Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation.

Baek S, Park H, Igci F, Lee D Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(20).

PMID: 36293347 PMC: 9604346. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012490.


How to correctly estimate the electric field in capacitively coupled systems for tissue engineering: a comparative study.

Meneses J, Fernandes S, Alves N, Pascoal-Faria P, Miranda P Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):11049.

PMID: 35773278 PMC: 9247067. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14834-2.