» Articles » PMID: 1437475

Information Tradeoffs in Complex Stimulus Structure: Local and Global Levels in Naturalistic Scenes

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1992 Oct 1
PMID 1437475
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An information tradeoff is an increased processing or utilization of information from one stimulus source at the expense of processing or utilization of information from a different source. An experiment was conducted to determine whether information tradeoffs occurred when subjects attended selectively to one of two different structural levels of naturalistic scenes. The subjects' attentional focus was directed to either the global or local structure of a scene (i.e., the scene or an object in the scene, respectively) either before or after presentation of a scene. They then had to use the information obtained from a 100-msec exposure of the scene to choose between two forced-choice alternatives that described one of the levels. The nature of the alternatives was such that both alternatives adequately characterized one of the structural levels on the basis of physical and semantic relations within the scene. Results showed that the subjects were significantly slower and less accurate when their attentional focus and the forced-choice alternatives were at different levels of stimulus structure than when they were at the same level, providing evidence of an information tradeoff when different types of information from a scene were used. When processing information from a particular structural level, information from the other level either was less available or was not used efficiently. Furthermore, the information tradeoffs were more severe in the precue than in the postcue condition, indicating differences in the efficiency of the selectivity process. The results are interpreted with respect to the role of selective attention in processing complex stimuli such as naturalistic scenes.

Citing Articles

Tracking the Evil Eye: Trait Anger and Selective Attention within Ambiguously Hostile Scenes.

Wilkowski B, Robinson M, Gordon R, Troop-Gordon W J Res Pers. 2014; 41(3):650-666.

PMID: 24920865 PMC: 4049355. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003.


Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences.

Wilkinson K, Light J, Drager K Augment Altern Commun. 2012; 28(3):137-47.

PMID: 22946989 PMC: 3640629. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2012.704522.


Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks.

Wolfe J, Bilsky A Percept Psychophys. 1994; 55(5):537-50.

PMID: 8008555 DOI: 10.3758/bf03205311.

References
1.
Sperling G, Melchner M . The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search. Science. 1978; 202(4365):315-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.694536. View

2.
Loftus G, NELSON W, Kallman H . Differential acquisition rates for different types of information from pictures. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983; 35(Pt 1):187-98. DOI: 10.1080/14640748308402124. View

3.
Kosslyn S, Ball T, Reiser B . Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978; 4(1):47-60. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.4.1.47. View

4.
Hoffman J . Interaction between global and local levels of a form. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1980; 6(2):222-34. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.6.2.222. View

5.
Haber R . Nature of the effect of set on perception. Psychol Rev. 1966; 73(4):335-51. DOI: 10.1037/h0023442. View