» Articles » PMID: 1435930

A Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Lyme Disease After Deer-tick Bites

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1992 Dec 27
PMID 1435930
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Borrelia burgdorferi, which causes Lyme disease, is transmitted by deer ticks (lxodes dammini) in the northeastern and midwestern United States. Although deer-tick bites are common in areas in which the disease is endemic, there is uncertainty about how to manage the care of persons who are bitten.

Methods: To assess the risk of infection with B. burgdorferi and the efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial treatment after a deer-tick bite, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in an area of southeastern Connecticut in which Lyme disease is endemic. Children and adults who had been bitten by deer ticks were randomly assigned to receive either amoxicillin or placebo for 10 days. Subjects were followed for one year for clinical manifestations of Lyme disease. Serum samples obtained at enrollment and six weeks and three months later were tested for antibodies against B. burgdorferi.

Results: Of the 387 subjects, 205 (53 percent) were assigned to receive amoxicillin and 182 (47 percent) to receive placebo. Of 344 deer ticks submitted and analyzed by the polymerase chain reaction, 15 percent were infected with B. burgdorferi. Erythema migrans developed in two subjects, both of whom had received placebo. There were no asymptomatic seroconversions and no late manifestations of Lyme disease. The risk of infection with B. burgdorferi in the placebo-treated subjects was 1.2 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 4.1 percent), which was not significantly different (P = 0.22) from the risk in the amoxicillin-treated subjects (0 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 1.5 percent).

Conclusions: Even in an area in which Lyme disease is endemic, the risk of infection with B. burgdorferi after a recognized deer-tick bite is so low that prophylactic antimicrobial treatment is not routinely indicated.

Citing Articles

Current and emerging approaches for eliminating and alleviating persistent Lyme disease symptoms.

Zafar K, Azuama O, Parveen N Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1459202.

PMID: 39345262 PMC: 11427371. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1459202.


Tick species infesting humans in the United States.

Eisen L Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022; 13(6):102025.

PMID: 35973261 PMC: 10862467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.102025.


Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhou G, Xu X, Zhang Y, Yue P, Luo S, Fan Y BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21(1):1141.

PMID: 34749665 PMC: 8573889. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06837-7.


Lyme disease: clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Hatchette T, Davis I, Johnston B Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018; 40(11):194-208.

PMID: 29769842 PMC: 5864449. DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v40i11a01.


Critical Evaluation of the Linkage Between Tick-Based Risk Measures and the Occurrence of Lyme Disease Cases.

Eisen L, Eisen R J Med Entomol. 2016; 53(5):1050-1062.

PMID: 27330093 PMC: 5777907. DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjw092.