» Articles » PMID: 1403993

Temperature Coupling in Cricket Acoustic Communication. II. Localization of Temperature Effects on Song Production and Recognition Networks in Gryllus Firmus

Overview
Date 1992 Aug 1
PMID 1403993
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acoustic communication in Gryllus firmus is temperature-coupled: temperature induces parallel changes in male calling song temporal pattern, and in female preference for song. Temperature effects on song production and recognition networks were localized by selectively warming head or thorax or both head and thorax of intact crickets, then eliciting aggression song production (males) or phonotaxis to synthetic calling song (females). Because male song is produced by a thoracic central pattern generator (CPG), and because head ganglia are necessary for female song recognition, measurements of female phonotaxis under such conditions may be used to test the following competing hypotheses about organization of the song recognition network: 1. A set of neurons homologous to the male song CPG exist in the female, and are used as a template that determines preferred values of song temporal parameters for song pattern recognition (the common neural elements hypothesis), and 2. temporal pattern preference is determined entirely within the head ganglia. Neither selective warming of the head nor of the thorax was effective in changing female song preference, but simultaneous warming of head and thorax shifted preference toward a faster song in most preparations, as did warming the whole animal by raising ambient temperature. These results suggest that phonotactic preference for song temporal pattern is plurisegmentally determined in field crickets. Selective warming experiments during aggression song production in males revealed that syllable period is influenced but not completely determined by thoracic temperature; head temperature is irrelevant. The song CPG appears to receive some rate-setting information from outside the thoracic central nervous system.

Citing Articles

Differences in male and hearing systems facilitate recognition of conspecific female flight tones.

Loh Y, Xu Y, Lee T, Ohashi T, Zhang Y, Eberl D iScience. 2024; 27(7):110264.

PMID: 39027372 PMC: 11255862. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110264.


A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.

Beetz M J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024; 210(2):325-346.

PMID: 38411712 PMC: 10995053. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-024-01695-5.


Parasitoid-host eavesdropping reveals temperature coupling of preferences to communication signals without genetic coupling.

Jirik K, Dominguez J, Abdulkarim I, Glaaser J, Stoian E, Almanza L Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2005):20230775.

PMID: 37583323 PMC: 10427829. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0775.


Behavioral evidence for nested central pattern generator control of grooming.

Ravbar P, Zhang N, Simpson J Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 34936550 PMC: 8694699. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.71508.


Using focal cooling to link neural dynamics and behavior.

Banerjee A, Egger R, Long M Neuron. 2021; 109(16):2508-2518.

PMID: 34171292 PMC: 8376768. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.029.


References
1.
Hoy R . Acoustic communication in crickets: a model system for the study of feature detection. Fed Proc. 1978; 37(10):2316-23. View

2.
Boake C . Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: Genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 6(7):225-7. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90027-U. View

3.
Miles C . The effects of behaviourally relevant temperatures on mechanosensory neurones of the grasshopper, Schistocerca americana. J Exp Biol. 1985; 116:121-39. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.116.1.121. View

4.
Robertson R, Pearson K, Reichert H . Flight interneurons in the locust and the origin of insect wings. Science. 1982; 217(4555):177-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.217.4555.177. View

5.
Pires A, Hoy R . Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. I. Field and laboratory studies of temperature effects on calling song production and recognition in Gryllus firmus. J Comp Physiol A. 1992; 171(1):69-78. DOI: 10.1007/BF00195962. View