» Articles » PMID: 1399984

Dependence of Pharyngeal Resistance on Genioglossal EMG Activity, Nasal Resistance, and Airflow

Overview
Date 1992 Aug 11
PMID 1399984
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the quantitative relationships among pharyngeal resistance (Rph), genioglossal electromyographic (EMGge) activity, nasal resistance (Rna), and airflow in 11 normal men aged 19-50 while they were awake. We made measurements with subjects seated with the head erect, seated with the head flexed forward approximately 40 degrees, and supine. Each subject wore a face mask connected to a pneumotachograph to measure airflow. After topical anesthesia of the nose, two catheters for measuring nasal and pharyngeal airway pressures were passed through one nostril: the nasal pressure catheter was positioned at the nasal choanae, and the pharyngeal pressure catheter was positioned just above the epiglottis. We measured EMGge activity with an intraoral surface electrode. The subjects breathed exclusively through the nose while inhaling room air or rebreathing CO2. We measured Rph, Rna, airflow, and EMGge activity at approximately 90-ms intervals throughout each inspiration. Rph was invariant as head position was changed. At any given head position, EMGge activity rose as airflow increased, and Rph remained constant. In contrast, Rna increased as airflow increased. Because Rph was constant, EMGge activity was not correlated with Rph, but EMGge was positively correlated with Rna and airflow. On the basis of the stability of Rph in the face of marked changes in collapsing forces, we conclude that the dynamic interplay of posture, head and jaw position, and upper airway muscle activity quite effectively maintains pharyngeal patency, and interactions among these factors are subtle and complex.

Citing Articles

Role of sensory stimulation in amelioration of obstructive sleep apnea.

Daulatzai M Sleep Disord. 2013; 2011:596879.

PMID: 23470957 PMC: 3581136. DOI: 10.1155/2011/596879.


The supraglottic effect of a reduction in expiratory mask pressure during continuous positive airway pressure.

Masdeu M, Patel A, Seelall V, Rapoport D, Ayappa I Sleep. 2012; 35(2):263-72.

PMID: 22294817 PMC: 3250366. DOI: 10.5665/sleep.1636.


Changes in upper airway size during tidal breathing in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Arens R, Sin S, McDonough J, Palmer J, Dominguez T, Meyer H Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 171(11):1298-304.

PMID: 15750038 PMC: 2718463. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200411-1597OC.


Effect of Jaw and Head Position on Airway Resistance in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Choi J, Goldman M, Koyal S, Clark G Sleep Breath. 2002; 4(4):163-168.

PMID: 11894202 DOI: 10.1007/s11325-000-0163-1.


Oral airway resistance during wakefulness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Amis T, ONeill N, Wheatley J Thorax. 1999; 54(5):423-6.

PMID: 10212107 PMC: 1763772. DOI: 10.1136/thx.54.5.423.