» Articles » PMID: 1395296

The Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty. An in Vitro Comparison of Three Cement Techniques

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1992 Nov 1
PMID 1395296
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three cementation techniques were investigated to determine their effect on initial fixation of unicondylar tibial components. Twenty-one anatomic specimens were divided into three groups. In Groups A and B, the medial tibial plateau was minimally resected. Group A was drill interdigitated and pulse lavaged, Group B was left "as cut". In Group C, the articular cartilage was curetted, exposing the subchondral bone entirely. An Ortholoc II unicondylar prosthesis was cemented onto the tibias, after which a 981-N load was applied anteromedially at 1 Hz for 10,000 cycles. Measurements for anterior and posterior micromotion were taken at the first cycle, every ten cycles for the first 100 cycles, every 100 cycles for the first 1000, and every 250 cycles thereafter. Measurements for anterior subsidence and posterior liftoff were taken after every 1000 cycles. Group A was found to be significantly better than Group B in anterior micromotion, posterior micromotion, and posterior liftoff in all load cycles. Group A was also found to be significantly better than Group C in anterior micromotion, posterior micromotion, and posterior liftoff in all load cycles. The performance of Groups B and C was highly variable. Both groups had specimens with extreme micromotions in response to low loads. Group A provided consistent and superior results. This study shows that cementation techniques employing multiple-drill-hole interdigitation and pulse lavage produce rigid initial fixation and consistent excellent results. Cementing to the smooth subchondral bone or unlavaged cancellous bone was unreliable.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Cementing Techniques on Implant Longevity in Relation to Keel Length in Persona and NexGen Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Study.

Vaziri A, Tahmasebi M, Hadi H, Javidmehr S, Keyhani S, Vahdati Z Arthroplast Today. 2025; 31:101608.

PMID: 39898284 PMC: 11787453. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101608.


Revision total elbow arthroplasty using intramedullary strut allograft for aseptic loosening of the humeral stem.

Johnson N, Hamid N, Hysong A, Rowe T, Connor P JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 2(3):369-375.

PMID: 37588862 PMC: 10426586. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.02.004.


Is TKA femoral implant stability improved by pressure applied cement? a comparison of 2 cementing techniques.

Schonhoff M, Beckmann N, Schwarze M, Eissler M, Kretzer J, Renkawitz T BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):51.

PMID: 36670400 PMC: 9863212. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06151-0.


The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions.

Eckert J, Bitsch R, Sonntag R, Reiner T, Schwarze M, Jaeger S Bone Joint Res. 2022; 11(2):82-90.

PMID: 35124977 PMC: 8882328. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2.


Plain Radiographs Can Safely Be Used to Measure and Follow Up on Tibial Component Alignment in Unicondylar Knee Replacement: A Correlation Study With CT Scans.

Veizi E, Cay N, Guven S, Sahin A, Firat A, Kilicarslan K Cureus. 2021; 13(8):e16902.

PMID: 34513475 PMC: 8418210. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16902.