A Comparison Between Cystatin C, Plasma Creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault Formula for the Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Overview
Nephrology
Affiliations
Background: In clinical practice, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often estimated from plasma creatinine. Several studies have shown cystatin C (cys C) to be a better parameter for the diagnosis of impaired renal function. No data are available, however, on the performance of cys C in follow-up of patients, compared with creatinine. Also, comparisons of cys C with the Cockcroft and Gault (C&G) formula for estimation of GFR are few.
Methods: Plasma samples were obtained from 93 consecutive patients seen for GFR determination and from 30 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, of whom 23 were investigated a second time after 2 years. GFR was determined with [125I]iothalamate. Plasma creatinine was determined enzymatically and the creatinine clearance calculated according to C&G. Cys C was measured with a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric method.
Results: GFR correlated with 1/cys C (r = 0.873) as well as with C&G (r = 0.876). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curves (ROCs), a measure of diagnostic accuracy, for cys C (0.931) and C&G (0.938) were equal (P = 0.815) and both better than the creatinine AUC (0.848; P = 0.006). Bland and Altman analysis showed that the simple formula GFR = -4.32 + 80.35 x 1/cys C, derived from our data, gave more accurate (P < 0.0001) and more precise (P = 0.024) GFR estimates than obtained with the C&G formula. The day-to-day variation (biological +analytical) for cys C was small (3.1%, SD 2.51%) in diabetic patients. In the follow-up study in diabetic patients, cys C was the parameter which had the best correlation (r = 0.66) with changes in GFR.
Conclusions: Cys C shows a high correlation with GFR. With a very simple formula, cys C gives a good estimate of GFR, more accurate and precise than C&G. Because biological variation is low, cys C gives also a good assessment of GFR changes during follow-up. Cys C is the preferred endogenous parameter for GFR.
Singh D, Mondal S, Sarkar D Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67293.
PMID: 39301365 PMC: 11411851. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67293.
Lamb E, Barratt J, Brettell E, Cockwell P, Dalton R, Deeks J Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(35):1-169.
PMID: 39056437 PMC: 11331378. DOI: 10.3310/HYHN1078.
Recent advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of hepatorenal syndrome: A review.
Kiani C, Zori A World J Hepatol. 2023; 15(6):741-754.
PMID: 37397940 PMC: 10308288. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i6.741.
Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Children with Acute Kidney Injury.
Raina M, Ashraf A, Soundararajan A, Mandal A, Sethi S Paediatr Drugs. 2023; 25(4):425-442.
PMID: 37266815 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-023-00572-z.
Downes K, Zuppa A, Sharova A, Neely M Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(5).
PMID: 37242578 PMC: 10220925. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051336.