» Articles » PMID: 13679476

A Comparison Between Cystatin C, Plasma Creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault Formula for the Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate

Overview
Date 2003 Sep 19
PMID 13679476
Citations 127
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often estimated from plasma creatinine. Several studies have shown cystatin C (cys C) to be a better parameter for the diagnosis of impaired renal function. No data are available, however, on the performance of cys C in follow-up of patients, compared with creatinine. Also, comparisons of cys C with the Cockcroft and Gault (C&G) formula for estimation of GFR are few.

Methods: Plasma samples were obtained from 93 consecutive patients seen for GFR determination and from 30 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, of whom 23 were investigated a second time after 2 years. GFR was determined with [125I]iothalamate. Plasma creatinine was determined enzymatically and the creatinine clearance calculated according to C&G. Cys C was measured with a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric method.

Results: GFR correlated with 1/cys C (r = 0.873) as well as with C&G (r = 0.876). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curves (ROCs), a measure of diagnostic accuracy, for cys C (0.931) and C&G (0.938) were equal (P = 0.815) and both better than the creatinine AUC (0.848; P = 0.006). Bland and Altman analysis showed that the simple formula GFR = -4.32 + 80.35 x 1/cys C, derived from our data, gave more accurate (P < 0.0001) and more precise (P = 0.024) GFR estimates than obtained with the C&G formula. The day-to-day variation (biological +analytical) for cys C was small (3.1%, SD 2.51%) in diabetic patients. In the follow-up study in diabetic patients, cys C was the parameter which had the best correlation (r = 0.66) with changes in GFR.

Conclusions: Cys C shows a high correlation with GFR. With a very simple formula, cys C gives a good estimate of GFR, more accurate and precise than C&G. Because biological variation is low, cys C gives also a good assessment of GFR changes during follow-up. Cys C is the preferred endogenous parameter for GFR.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Plasma Cystatin C as a Marker of Acute Renal Injury in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stone Disease.

Singh D, Mondal S, Sarkar D Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67293.

PMID: 39301365 PMC: 11411851. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67293.


Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate estimation using creatinine and cystatin C for identifying and monitoring moderate chronic kidney disease: the eGFR-C study.

Lamb E, Barratt J, Brettell E, Cockwell P, Dalton R, Deeks J Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(35):1-169.

PMID: 39056437 PMC: 11331378. DOI: 10.3310/HYHN1078.


Recent advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of hepatorenal syndrome: A review.

Kiani C, Zori A World J Hepatol. 2023; 15(6):741-754.

PMID: 37397940 PMC: 10308288. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i6.741.


Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Children with Acute Kidney Injury.

Raina M, Ashraf A, Soundararajan A, Mandal A, Sethi S Paediatr Drugs. 2023; 25(4):425-442.

PMID: 37266815 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-023-00572-z.


Optimizing Vancomycin Therapy in Critically Ill Children: A Population Pharmacokinetics Study to Inform Vancomycin Area under the Curve Estimation Using Novel Biomarkers.

Downes K, Zuppa A, Sharova A, Neely M Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 37242578 PMC: 10220925. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051336.