» Articles » PMID: 1360151

Effects of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline on the Prolactin Suppression Induced by a Series of Full and Partial Dopamine D2 Receptor Agonists in Male Rats

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1992 Aug 1
PMID 1360151
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of pretreatment with a high dose of the alkylating agent N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) (20 mg/kg, 24 h) on the intrinsic activity displayed by a series of full and partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists on prolactin regulating pituitary D2 receptors in male rats was studied. To increase baseline prolactin levels, gamma-butyrolactone in a dose inhibiting brain dopamine neurotransmission was given to all animals. In controls, i.e. rats not given EEDQ, supramaximal doses of all full and partial D2 receptor agonists tested decreased serum prolactin levels with greater than 80%. While the intrinsic activities of the dopamine precursor 1-DOPA and of the full agonists (+)-3-PPP, 5-OH-DPAT, B-HT 920 (talipexole), apomorphine, and NPA (R-(-)-N-n-propylnorapomorphine) were not affected by pretreatment with EEDQ, the effects of supramaximal doses of the partial agonists (-)-HW-165, TDHL (terguride), SDZ208-911, (-)-3-PP) (preclamol), and SDZ 208-912 were reduced to 66%, 74%, 59%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The effect of EEDQ on the intrinsic activity displayed by the various agonists corresponds inversely to the intrinsic efficacy displayed by the drugs in other models of D2 receptor function with one exception only; thus, the prolactin suppressive effect of (-)-3-PPP was more effectively antagonized by EEDQ than would have been predicted from the intrinsic efficacy usually attributed to the drug. Since the dose of EEDQ used in the present study has previously been shown not to decrease D2 receptor density in the pituitary as measured using in vivo radioligand binding, it is suggested that alkylation of D2 receptors may change the conformation of the individual receptor complexes in a way that decreases the responsiveness to partial but not full agonists.

References
1.
Hamblin M, Creese I . Behavioral and radioligand binding evidence for irreversible dopamine receptor blockade by N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline. Life Sci. 1983; 32(19):2247-55. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(83)90423-x. View

2.
Eriksson E, Svensson K, Clark D . The putative dopamine autoreceptor agonist B-HT 920 decreases nigral dopamine cell firing rate and prolactin release in rat. Life Sci. 1985; 36(19):1819-27. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90154-7. View

3.
Clark D, Hjorth S, Carlsson A . Dopamine receptor agonists: mechanisms underlying autoreceptor selectivity. II. Theoretical considerations. J Neural Transm. 1985; 62(3-4):171-207. DOI: 10.1007/BF01252236. View

4.
Svensson K, Ekman A, Piercey M, Hoffmann W, Lum J, Carlsson A . Effects of the partial dopamine receptor agonists SDZ 208-911, SDZ 208-912 and terguride on central monoamine receptors. A behavioral, biochemical and electrophysiological study. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1991; 344(3):263-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF00182999. View

5.
Meller E, Bohmaker K, Namba Y, Friedhoff A, Goldstein M . Relationship between receptor occupancy and response at striatal dopamine autoreceptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1987; 31(6):592-8. View