» Articles » PMID: 1354734

Anorectic Activity of Fluoxetine and Norfluoxetine in Rats: Relationship Between Brain Concentrations and In-vitro Potencies on Monoaminergic Mechanisms

Overview
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 1992 Mar 1
PMID 1354734
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was aimed at establishing the importance of brain monoamine uptake and release mechanisms in the anorectic activity of fluoxetine, relating them to the actual brain concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolite norfluoxetine after anorectic doses in rats. Both compounds showed anorectic activity when administered intraperitoneally, norfluoxetine being slightly more active (ED50 = 22.9 mumol kg-1) than fluoxetine (ED50 = 35.0 mumol kg-1) despite the fact that the metabolite is about ten times less potent than the parent drug in inhibiting 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake. Comparing the brain concentrations of norfluoxetine, in terms of maximum concentrations (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC), after the ED50 of fluoxetine or synthetic norfluoxetine, it also appeared that the metabolite plays a major role in the anorectic effect of the parent drug in rats. Brain Cmax of fluoxetine (48.7 microM) and norfluoxetine (21.7 and 27.3 microM after metabolite and drug, respectively) were several times those blocking 5-HT uptake in-vitro (0.5 microM), making it unlikely that fluoxetine (directly or through its metabolite) reduces food intake by specifically blocking 5-HT neuronal uptake. Brain Cmax of fluoxetine but particularly norfluoxetine were more compatible with those capable in-vitro of affecting catecholaminergic mechanisms, such as inhibition of dopamine and noradrenaline uptake and enhancement of dopamine release. These results together with recent in-vitro findings that the parent compound and its active metabolite induce tritium release from hippocampal synaptosomes previously loaded with [3H]5-HT suggest that mechanisms other than inhibition of 5-HT uptake are involved in the anorectic action of these compounds in rats.

Citing Articles

Anxiolytic profile of fluoxetine as monitored following repeated administration in animal rat model of chronic mild stress.

Farhan M, Haleem D Saudi Pharm J. 2016; 24(5):571-578.

PMID: 27752230 PMC: 5059824. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.03.006.


Fluoxetine prevents 8-OH-DPAT-induced hyperphagia in Fischer inbred rats.

Miryala C, Maswood N, Uphouse L Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011; 98(2):311-5.

PMID: 21281662 PMC: 3057281. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.01.014.


Chronic citalopram administration causes a sustained suppression of serotonin synthesis in the mouse forebrain.

Honig G, Jongsma M, van der Hart M, Tecott L PLoS One. 2009; 4(8):e6797.

PMID: 19710918 PMC: 2728775. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006797.


Modest effects of repeated fluoxetine on estrous cyclicity and sexual behavior in Sprague Dawley female rats.

Maswood N, Sarkar J, Uphouse L Brain Res. 2008; 1245:52-60.

PMID: 18929547 PMC: 2760087. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.063.


Daily male exposure attenuates estrous cycle disruption by fluoxetine.

Sarkar J, Hiegel C, Maswood N, Uphouse L Behav Brain Res. 2008; 189(1):83-91.

PMID: 18243351 PMC: 2366050. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.12.011.