» Articles » PMID: 1333040

Transcription Enhances Intrachromosomal Homologous Recombination in Mammalian Cells

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1992 Dec 1
PMID 1333040
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The influence of transcription on homologous intrachromosomal recombination between direct and inverted repeats has been examined by using Chinese hamster ovary cells. Recombination was monitored between two integrated neomycin (neo) genes, including one silent allele and a second allele regulated by the inducible mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Transcription of mouse mammary tumor virus neo alleles was regulated with the glucocorticoid hormone dexamethasone. Alleles transcribed at high levels recombined about two- to sevenfold more frequently than identical alleles transcribed at low levels. Direct repeats recombined primarily by a gene conversion mechanism; inverted repeats produced a variety of rearranged products. These results are discussed in relation to recombinational processes that regulate gene expression, influence gene family structures, and mediate genomic instability associated with cellular transformation and tumorigenesis.

Citing Articles

Transgenic mice harboring direct repeat substrates reveal key underlying causes of homologous recombination in vivo.

Moise A, Kay J, Engelward B DNA Repair (Amst). 2022; 120:103419.

PMID: 36257175 PMC: 10189647. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103419.


The UVSSA complex alleviates MYC-driven transcription stress.

Sato M, Liebau R, Liu Z, Liu L, Rabadan R, Gautier J J Cell Biol. 2021; 220(2).

PMID: 33404608 PMC: 7791342. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201807163.


Engineering of α-PD-1 antibody-expressing long-lived plasma cells by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted gene integration.

Luo B, Zhan Y, Luo M, Dong H, Liu J, Lin Y Cell Death Dis. 2020; 11(11):973.

PMID: 33184267 PMC: 7661525. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-03187-1.


Transcribing malignancy: transcription-associated genomic instability in cancer.

Boulianne B, Feldhahn N Oncogene. 2017; 37(8):971-981.

PMID: 29106394 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2017.402.


Transcription-replication conflicts at chromosomal fragile sites-consequences in M phase and beyond.

Oestergaard V, Lisby M Chromosoma. 2016; 126(2):213-222.

PMID: 27796495 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-016-0617-2.


References
1.
Lin F, Sperle K, Sternberg N . Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol Cell Biol. 1984; 4(6):1020-34. PMC: 368869. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.4.6.1020-1034.1984. View

2.
Klar A, Strathern J, Hicks J . A position-effect control for gene transposition: state of expression of yeast mating-type genes affects their ability to switch. Cell. 1981; 25(2):517-24. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90070-2. View

3.
Ringold G, Yamamoto K, Bishop J, Varmus H . Glucocorticoid-stimulated accumulation of mouse mammary tumor virus RNA: increased rate of synthesis of viral RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977; 74(7):2879-83. PMC: 431330. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2879. View

4.
Shenkar R, Shen M, Arnheim N . DNase I-hypersensitive sites and transcription factor-binding motifs within the mouse E beta meiotic recombination hot spot. Mol Cell Biol. 1991; 11(4):1813-9. PMC: 359851. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.11.4.1813-1819.1991. View

5.
Grimm C, Schaer P, Munz P, Kohli J . The strong ADH1 promoter stimulates mitotic and meiotic recombination at the ADE6 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 1991; 11(1):289-98. PMC: 359619. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.289-298.1991. View