Proposal of a Quality-index or Metric for Soft Copy Display Systems: Contrast Sensitivity Study

Overview

Journal J Digit Imaging

Publisher Springer

Specialties Medical Informatics
Radiology

Date 2003 Sep 10

PMID 12964056

Citations 6

Authors

Jihong Wang

Ken Compton

Qi Peng

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In addition to the inherent qualities of a digital image, the qualities of the monitor and graphics control card as well as the viewing conditions will affect the perceived quality of an image that is displayed on a soft copy display (SD) system. With the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), many diagnoses are being made based on images displayed on SD devices, and consequently SD quality may affect the accuracy of diagnosis. Unlike the traditional film-on-lightbox display, optimal SD system parameters are not well defined, and many issues remain unsettled. In this article, the human observer performance, as measured by contrast sensitivity, for several SD devices including an active matrix liquid crystal flat panel monitor is reported. Contrast sensitivities were measured with various display system configurations. Experimental results showed that contrast sensitivity depends on many factors such as the type of monitor, the monitor brightness, and the gamma settings of the graphics card in a complex manner. However, there is a clear correlation between the measured contrast thresholds and the gradient of the display device's luminance response curve. Based on this correlation, it is proposed to use the gradient of luminance response curve as a quality-index or metric for SD devices.

Citing Articles

Human contrast-detail performance with declining contrast.

Walz-Flannigan A, Babcock B, Kagadis G, Wang J, Langer S Med Phys. 2012; 39(9):5446-56.

PMID: 22957612 PMC: 3895086. DOI: 10.1118/1.4742851.

Comparison of the commercial color LCD and the medical monochrome LCD using randomized object test patterns.

Wu J, Wu T, Han R, Chang S, Shih C, Sun J PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e37769.

PMID: 22701534 PMC: 3365102. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037769.

Contrast sensitivity of digital imaging display systems: contrast threshold dependency on object type and implications for monitor quality assurance and quality control in PACS.

Wang J, Xu J, Baladandayuthapani V Med Phys. 2009; 36(8):3682-92.

PMID: 19746801 PMC: 3910133. DOI: 10.1118/1.3173816.

Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.

Geijer H, Geijer M, Forsberg L, Kheddache S, Sund P J Digit Imaging. 2007; 20(2):114-21.

PMID: 17340227 PMC: 3043910. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9028-5.

Assessment of PACS display systems.

Aldrich J, Rutledge J J Digit Imaging. 2005; 18(4):287-95.

PMID: 16094505 PMC: 3046721. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-005-6974-7.

References

Wang J, Langer S . A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems. J Digit Imaging. 1997; 10(4):158-68. PMC: 3452987. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168838. View

Cook L, Cox G, Insana M, McFadden M, Hall T, Gaborski R . Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images. Med Phys. 1998; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. DOI: 10.1118/1.598304. View

Hangiandreou N, Fetterly K, Bernatz S, Cesar L, Groth D, Felmlee J . Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality. J Digit Imaging. 1998; 11(3 Suppl 1):180-6. PMC: 3453343. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168299. View

Roehrig H, Krupinski E . Image Quality of CRT displays and the effect of brightness of diagnosis of mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 1998; 11(3 Suppl 1):187-8. PMC: 3453332. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168300. View

Pilgram T, Slone R, Muka E, Cox J, Blaine G . Perceived fidelity of compressed and reconstructed radiological images: a preliminary exploration of compression, luminance, and viewing distance. J Digit Imaging. 1998; 11(4):168-75. PMC: 3453155. DOI: 10.1007/BF03178079. View

Roehrig H . Image quality assurance for CRT display systems. J Digit Imaging. 1999; 12(1):1-2. PMC: 3452429. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168620. View

Roehrig H . Image quality assurance for CRT display systems--Part II. J Digit Imaging. 1999; 12(2):49. PMC: 3452491. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168842. View

Flynn M, Badano A . Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices. J Digit Imaging. 1999; 12(2):50-9. PMC: 3452495. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168843. View

Arenson R, Chakraborty D, Seshadri S, KUNDEL H . The digital imaging workstation. Radiology. 1990; 176(2):303-15. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.176.2.2367643. View

10.

Wang J, Peng Q . An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests. J Digit Imaging. 2002; 15 Suppl 1:216-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-5003-3. View

11.

Wang J, Anderson J, Lane T, Stetson C, Moore J . Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices. J Digit Imaging. 2000; 13(2 Suppl 1):162-7. PMC: 3453272. DOI: 10.1007/BF03167651. View

12.

Roehrig H, Willis C, Damento M . Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field. J Digit Imaging. 1999; 12(4):152-65. PMC: 3452426. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168851. View

13.

Hemminger B, Johnston R, Rolland J, Muller K . Introduction to perceptual linearization of video display systems for medical image presentation. J Digit Imaging. 1995; 8(1):21-34. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168052. View

14.

Roehrig H, Blume H, Ji T, Browne M . Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays. J Digit Imaging. 1990; 3(3):134-45. DOI: 10.1007/BF03167599. View

15.

Dwyer 3rd S, Stewart B, Sayre J, Aberle D, Boechat M, Honeyman J . Performance characteristics and image fidelity of gray-scale monitors. Radiographics. 1992; 12(4):765-72. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.12.4.1636038. View

16.

Reiker G, Gohel N, Muka E, Blaine G . Quality monitoring of soft-copy displays for medical radiography. J Digit Imaging. 1992; 5(3):161-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF03167765. View

17.

Horii S . Quality assurance for picture archiving and communcication systems (PACS) and PACS technology applications in radiology. J Digit Imaging. 1995; 8(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168049. View

18.

Hangiandreou N, Fetterly K, Felmlee J . Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation. J Digit Imaging. 1999; 12(2):60-7. PMC: 3452489. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168844. View

19.

Langer S, Wang J . User and system interface issues in the purchase of imaging and information systems. J Digit Imaging. 1996; 9(3):113-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168605. View

20.

Blume H, Hemminger B . Image presentation in digital radiology: perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application. Radiographics. 1997; 17(3):769-77. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.17.3.9153711. View