» Articles » PMID: 12957244

Cosmesis from the Patient's and the Doctor's View

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2003 Sep 6
PMID 12957244
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Long-term cosmesis from the patient's perspective is compared to the doctor's appraisal. Factors that determine judgment of cosmesis are analyzed. Also, a patient questionnaire was designed to screen for normal tissue reactions and is evaluated.

Methods And Patients: With structured questions, patients rated their satisfaction considering cosmesis, the difference in overall appearance, and specific changes of the breast. Two doctors rated cosmesis and radiation late effects (LENT/SOMA). Ratings were compared, and the relative impact of single items was studied. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with unilateral breast carcinoma were examined after a median follow-up of 8 years. They were treated between 1981 and 1995 with lumpectomy and radiotherapy of the breast with 1.8-2.5 Gy fractions with a median total dose of 55 Gy (range: 50-65 Gy).

Results: One hundred sixty-one patients rated cosmesis as satisfying, 73 patients rated it as acceptable, and 25 patients as poor. Eighty-nine patients noted severe changes of appearance. Severe firmness and extensive scars were the most frequent complaint; the most important single item for judging cosmesis as poor was highly visible scars. Generally, doctors rated cosmesis less favorably (satisfactory, 150 patients; poor, 43 patients). Severe fibrosis was more important than discoloration of the breast or scars. Correlation between patients' and doctors' rating of cosmesis was modest (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.29), whereas the doctor's rating correlated well (0.55). Specificity and sensitivity of the questionnaire item for severe fibrosis (using doctors' judgments as gold standard) was 0.8; Cohen's weighted kappa was 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.48).

Conclusion: Rating of cosmesis is subjective. Patients' satisfaction with cosmesis is greater than the doctors' and is determined not only by radiation late effects, but also by factors unrelated to the appearance of the breast. Severe fibrosis may be detected by a patient questionnaire.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of Different Quality of Life Assessment Modalities After Breast Cancer Therapy: A Network Meta-analysis.

Kastora S, Holmquist A, Valachis A, Rocco N, Meattini I, Somaiah N JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6):e2316878.

PMID: 37279001 PMC: 10245190. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16878.


Modified technique of closing the port site after multiport thoracoscopic surgery using the shingled suture technique: a single centre experience.

Xu H, Ren S, She T, Zhang J, Zhang L, Jia T BMC Surg. 2021; 21(1):223.

PMID: 33931065 PMC: 8086077. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01220-4.


Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal-free stitches.

Fu R, Zhang J, Dong S, Chen Y, Zhang C, Tang W Thorac Cancer. 2019; 10(9):1827-1833.

PMID: 31368233 PMC: 6718023. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13157.


Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer.

Li G, Qin S, Sun X, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zhang J Oncol Lett. 2018; 15(2):2465-2470.

PMID: 29434959 PMC: 5777371. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7603.


Hypofractionated boost after whole breast irradiation in breast carcinoma: chronic toxicity results and cosmesis.

Sanz J, Rodriguez N, Foro P, Dengra J, Reig A, Perez P Clin Transl Oncol. 2016; 19(4):464-469.

PMID: 27655367 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1548-3.