» Articles » PMID: 12950578

A Comparative Study of Selected Physical Properties of Five Root-canal Sealers

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2003 Sep 3
PMID 12950578
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To investigate selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers.

Methodology: The solubility, film thickness, flow, working and setting times of Roth 801, Tubli-Seal EWT, AH Plus, Apexit and Endion were evaluated. Solubility was measured by weight change of standard specimens in water over a 3-month period. Film thickness was measured as the distance between weighted glass slides containing a standard quantity of sealer. Flow was assessed by rate of sealer extrusion through a standard bore diameter, after unit time. Working time was taken as the point at which flow rate was reduced by 10%. The indentation test using a modified Gilmore needle was employed to investigate the setting times.

Results: AH Plus was the least soluble, whilst Apexit was the most unstable in water. The solubility values in increasing order were: AH Plus<Tubli-Seal EWT<Endion<Apexit. Also, AH Plus had the highest film thickness. All sealers showed comparable flow rates. The working time varied from 50 min for Endion to over 2 h for AH Plus and Tubli-Seal EWT. The range of setting times recorded was from 70 min for Tubli-Seal EWT to 8 days for Roth 801.

Conclusions: 1. AH Plus showed the greatest stability in solution and Tubli-Seal EWT performed well, but Apexit and Endion had higher solubility values. 2. The film thickness values in increasing order were: Tubli-Seal EWT<Apexit<Endion=Roth 801<AH Plus. 3. The flow rates for all sealers were similar. 4. The working times for all sealers were greater than 50 min. 5. Roth 801 did not set when incubated in volumes sufficient to fill the test matrices.

Citing Articles

Comparative evaluation of three accidentally extruded sealers in periapical healing - An evidence - based study.

Chhabra A, Yadav P, Babaria B, Singh R, Chhabra V, Prathap B J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 28(1):68-77.

PMID: 39974674 PMC: 11835353. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_728_24.


In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.

Mokhtari F, Modaresi J, Salmasi A, Khamisi N, Zandi H, Lesani K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1488.

PMID: 39696293 PMC: 11658299. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8.


Outcomes and prognostic factors of endodontically treated teeth filled with calcium silicate- or epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A retrospective cohort study.

Kangseng T, Banomyong D, Osiri S, Jantarat J Int Endod J. 2024; 58(1):84-96.

PMID: 39441564 PMC: 11629052. DOI: 10.1111/iej.14155.


Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Various Root Canal Obturation Techniques in Permanent Molars: An Study.

Deep A, Kundu M, Qamar S, Moses A, Agrawal R, Chatterjee D J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 3):S2509-S2511.

PMID: 39346395 PMC: 11426640. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_340_24.


Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study.

Radwanski M, Pietrzycka K, Eyuboglu T, Ozcan M, Lukomska-Szymanska M Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(9):479.

PMID: 39126493 PMC: 11316699. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05871-4.