» Articles » PMID: 12947492

Intraperitoneal Administration of the Angiogenesis Inhibitor Thalidomide Does Not Impair Anastomotic Healing Following Large Bowel Resection in a Rabbit Model

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2003 Aug 30
PMID 12947492
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of thalidomide after intraperitoneal instillation on the healing of colonic anastomoses are not known. A series of 40 New Zealand White rabbits underwent an end-to-end colonic anastomosis. The animals were randomized into four groups. Groups 1 (n = 10) and 2 (n = 10) were treated with dissolved thalidomide 200 mg/kg intraperitoneally, whereas groups 3 (n = 10) and 4 (n = 10) were treated only with the dissolver. Animals were sacrificed at day 3 (groups 1, 3) and day 7 (groups 2, 4). Anastomotic healing was tested by measuring the bursting pressure in vitro. Immunohistochemical staining of the anastomotic site was performed with polyclonal antibodies against CD31 and Mib-1, to determine a possible antiangiogenic or antiproliferative effect. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's log rank correlation and paired t-test. On postoperative day 3 (p > 0.19) and postoperative day 7 (p > 0.73), there was no difference in bursting pressure in the treatment and the control groups. Angiogenesis scores were reduced at day 3 in the thalidomide group (p < 0.05), but did not differ between the groups at day 7. White blood cell counts were decreased in the treatment groups at day 3 (p < 0.01) and day 7, compared to control groups (p < 0.01). There was no difference in the expression of Mib-1 in either group at day 3 or day 7. The intraperitoneal administration of thalidomide does not interfere with the healing of colonic anastomosis. Although the angiogenesis score is diminished at day 3, this did not lead to a reduced bursting pressure at day 3 or day 7.

Citing Articles

Thalidomide and its analogues: A review of the potential for immunomodulation of fibrosis diseases and opthalmopathy.

Liu T, Guo F, Zhu X, He X, Xie L Exp Ther Med. 2017; 14(6):5251-5257.

PMID: 29285050 PMC: 5740745. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5209.


PVA gel as a potential adhesion barrier: a safety study in a large animal model of intestinal surgery.

Renz B, Leitner K, Odermatt E, Worthley D, Angele M, Jauch K Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014; 399(3):349-57.

PMID: 24590429 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1159-1.


Effects of the histamine H2 receptor antagonist famotidine on the healing of colonic anastomosis in rats.

Inan A, Sen M, Surgit O, Ergin M, Bozer M Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009; 64(6):567-70.

PMID: 19578661 PMC: 2705151. DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000600012.


Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on anastomotic healing following large bowel resection in a rabbit model--a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Neuss H, Raue W, Muller V, Weichert W, Schwenk W, Mall J Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24(5):551-7.

PMID: 19184064 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0643-0.


Intracellular adenosine triphosphate delivery enhanced skin wound healing in rabbits.

Wang J, Zhang Q, Wan R, Mo Y, Li M, Tseng M Ann Plast Surg. 2009; 62(2):180-6.

PMID: 19158531 PMC: 5086668. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31817fe47e.

References
1.
Nahai F, Lamb J, Havican R, Stone H . Factors involved in disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Am Surg. 1977; 43(1):45-51. View

2.
Weidner N, Carroll P, Flax J, BLUMENFELD W, Folkman J . Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1993; 143(2):401-9. PMC: 1887042. View

3.
Saclarides T, Speziale N, Drab E, Szeluga D, Rubin D . Tumor angiogenesis and rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994; 37(9):921-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02052599. View

4.
Hellmann K, DUKE D, TUCKER D . PROLONGATION OF SKIN HOMOGRAFT SURVIVAL BY THALIDOMIDE. Br Med J. 1965; 2(5463):687-9. PMC: 1846106. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5463.687. View

5.
Holmgren L, OReilly M, Folkman J . Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression. Nat Med. 1995; 1(2):149-53. DOI: 10.1038/nm0295-149. View