» Articles » PMID: 12942004

Morphometric Evaluation of Screw Fixation in Atlas Via Posterior Arch and Lateral Mass

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2003 Aug 28
PMID 12942004
Citations 83
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: This study is a result of manual and radiologic measurements of 50 isolated anatomic specimens of C1 and five patients of atlantoaxial instability treated by screw fixation via posterior arch and lateral mass.

Objectives: To investigate the feasibility of screw placement via posterior arch and lateral mass in atlas.

Summary Of Background Data: Several types of posterior approaches have been adopted for stabilization and fusion of atlantoaxial complex. Before this study, Gallie in 1939 gave a report on a posterior wiring technique that depended on a structural bone graft. Since then, double-looped wiring with two bone grafts and Halifax clamp technique had been introduced. A transarticular screw fixation technique was introduced by Magerl and Seeman in 1987, and a C1 lateral mass screw fixation technique was described by Harms in 2001. However, the feasibility of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass has not been addressed until now.

Methods: Fifty dry samples of atlas were measured manually and radiologically with vernier calipers, protractors, and CT. The parameters of posterior arch, lateral mass, vertebral artery groove, axis length of screw path via posterior arch and lateral mass, the entry point, and screw direction were measured. Five patients of atlantoaxial instability were treated with this technique and the radiographs and CT scans were evaluated after surgery.

Results: The longest trajectory distance of the screw path was about 30 mm. The outer thickness at the thinnest part of groove was 4.58 mm, and it was found to be <4 mm in four cases (8%). The entry point is 18-20 mm lateral to the midline and 2 mm superior to the inferior border of posterior arch. The direction of screw placement is perpendicular to the coronal plane and about 5 degrees cephalad to the transverse plane. Ten screws via posterior arch and lateral mass were placed properly, without incidence of nerve or blood vessel injury in clinical practice.

Conclusion: Atlas is capable for screw fixation via its posterior arch and lateral mass.

Citing Articles

Revealing the potential: radiological assessment of pedicle screw placement in the craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine.

Holler L, Holler S, Jackle K, Roch P, Lehmann W, Weiser L Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 40055218 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08700-8.


Superior biomechanical stability of pedicle screws compared to lateral mass screws: recommendations for bicortical positioning and enhancing bone contact in geriatric C1 vertebrae.

Leonhardt L, Rorup L, Kammal A, Hahn M, Dreimann M, Ondruschka B J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):63.

PMID: 39827360 PMC: 11742196. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05472-1.


Determining anatomically-safe corridors for placement of lateral mass screws in the first cervical vertebra of the Emirati population - a CT study.

Suresh D, Naidoo N, AlSharhan R, Al Bastaki U, Lakshmanan J, Joseph B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1992.

PMID: 39814770 PMC: 11735791. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85181-1.


C1 Lateral Mass Screw Insertion Caudally From the C2 Nerve Root to Avoid Craniocervical Fusion in a Patient With Atlantoaxial Subluxation Associated With Ponticulus Posticus: A Case Report.

Hattori S, Wada K, Watanabe F, Matsutani S Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73478.

PMID: 39664136 PMC: 11634322. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73478.


Feasibility and Safety of the C1 "Zero Angle" Screw: A Novel "In-Out-In" Technique for Atlantoaxial Dislocation.

Chen Z, Huang X, Zou X, Lian P, Liu G, Chen J Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(2):437-445.

PMID: 39628069 PMC: 11787991. DOI: 10.1111/os.14309.