» Articles » PMID: 12927043

Mammographic Density is Related to Stroma and Stromal Proteoglycan Expression

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2003 Aug 21
PMID 12927043
Citations 135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mammographic density and certain histological changes in breast tissues are both risk factors for breast cancer. However, the relationship between these factors remains uncertain. Previous studies have focused on the histology of the epithelial changes, even though breast stroma is the major tissue compartment by volume. We have previously identified lumican and decorin as abundant small leucine-rich proteoglycans in breast stroma that show altered expression after breast tumorigenesis. In this study we have examined breast biopsies for a relationship between mammographic density and stromal alterations.

Methods: We reviewed mammograms from women aged 50-69 years who had enrolled in a provincial mammography screening program and had undergone an excision biopsy for an abnormality that was subsequently diagnosed as benign or pre-invasive breast disease. The overall mammographic density was classified into density categories. All biopsy tissue sections were reviewed and tissue blocks from excision margins distant from the diagnostic lesion were selected. Histological composition was assessed in sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and the expression of lumican and decorin was assessed by immunohistochemistry; both were quantified by semi-quantitative scoring.

Results: Tissue sections corresponding to regions of high in comparison with low mammographic density showed no significant difference in the density of ductal and lobular units but showed significantly higher collagen density and extent of fibrosis. Similarly, the expression of lumican and decorin was significantly increased.

Conclusion: Alteration in stromal composition is correlated with increased mammographic density. Although epithelial changes define the eventual pathway for breast cancer development, mammographic density might correspond more directly to alterations in stromal composition.

Citing Articles

Mammographic Breast Density at Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival.

Kanbayti I, Akwo J, Erim A, Ukpong E, Ekpo E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518350 PMC: 11545516. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14212382.


Association between breastfeeding, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk: a review.

Ye D, Bai X, Xu S, Qu N, Zhao N, Zheng Y Int Breastfeed J. 2024; 19(1):65.

PMID: 39285438 PMC: 11406879. DOI: 10.1186/s13006-024-00672-7.


Breast Collagen Organization: Variance by Patient Age and Breast Quadrant.

Asiimwe A, Marin M, Salvatore M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202236 PMC: 11353690. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161748.


Radiology of fibrosis. Part I: Thoracic organs.

Tarchi S, Salvatore M, Lichtenstein P, Sekar T, Capaccione K, Luk L J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):609.

PMID: 38956586 PMC: 11218337. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05244-1.


Spatial N-glycomics of the normal breast microenvironment reveals fucosylated and high-mannose N-glycan signatures related to BI-RADS density and ancestry.

Rujchanarong D, Spruill L, Sandusky G, Park Y, Mehta A, Drake R Glycobiology. 2024; 34(8).

PMID: 38869882 PMC: 11193881. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwae043.


References
1.
van Gils C, Hendriks J, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Otten J, Straatman H . Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000; 8(6):509-15. DOI: 10.1097/00008469-199912000-00006. View

2.
Chakravarti S, Magnuson T, Lass J, Jepsen K, Lamantia C, Carroll H . Lumican regulates collagen fibril assembly: skin fragility and corneal opacity in the absence of lumican. J Cell Biol. 1998; 141(5):1277-86. PMC: 2137175. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.141.5.1277. View

3.
Boyd N, Jensen H, Cooke G, Han H, Lockwood G, Miller A . Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000; 9(1):15-24. DOI: 10.1097/00008469-200002000-00003. View

4.
Moinfar F, Man Y, Arnould L, Bratthauer G, Ratschek M, Tavassoli F . Concurrent and independent genetic alterations in the stromal and epithelial cells of mammary carcinoma: implications for tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2000; 60(9):2562-6. View

5.
Pollak M . Insulin-like growth factor physiology and cancer risk. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 36(10):1224-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00102-7. View