» Articles » PMID: 12923409

The Influence of Absolute Cardiovascular Risk, Patient Utilities, and Costs on the Decision to Treat Hypertension: a Markov Decision Analysis

Overview
Journal J Hypertens
Date 2003 Aug 19
PMID 12923409
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering treatment over a lifetime.

Design: Markov decision analysis model comparing treatment and non-treatment of hypertension.

Participants: Hypothetical cohorts for 20 different strata of sex, age (30-79 years, in 10-year age bands), and cardiovascular risk (low and high risk).

Main Outcome Measures: Life expectancy, and incremental cost : effectiveness ratios for treatment and non-treatment strategies.

Results: In terms of life expectancy, blood pressure treatment increased life expectancy in all age, sex, and risk strata, by between 1.6 and 10.3%, compared with a policy of non-treatment. In terms of cost-effectiveness, treatment was more effective, but also cost more than non-treatment for all age, sex, and risk strata except the oldest high-risk men and women. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) among low-risk groups ranged from pound 1030 to pound 3304. Cost-effectiveness results for low-risk individuals were sensitive to the utility of receiving antihypertensive treatment. Treatment of high-risk individuals was highly cost-effective, such that it was the dominant strategy in the oldest age group, and resulted in incremental costs per QALY ranging from pound 34 to pound 265 in younger age groups.

Conclusions: Policy decisions about which patients to treat depend on whether a life-expectancy or cost-effectiveness perspective is taken. Treatment increases life expectancy in all strata of age, sex, and cardiovascular risk. However, younger individuals stand to gain proportionately more from blood pressure treatment than do the elderly. In terms of cost-effectiveness, patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease are a highly cost-effective group to treat. In patients at lower risk of cardiovascular disease, consideration should be given to issues of patient preference and cost.

Citing Articles

Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction of patients with cardiovascular disease in Ethiopia.

Tito K, Gebremariam G, Beyene K, Sander B, Gebretekle G Front Public Health. 2022; 10:972378.

PMID: 36299740 PMC: 9589146. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972378.


A Patient-Led Referral Strategy for Cardiovascular Screening of Family and Household Members at the Time of Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Admission.

Castiel J, Chen-Tournoux A, Thanassoulis G, Goldfarb M CJC Open. 2020; 2(6):506-513.

PMID: 33305210 PMC: 7710948. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.06.014.


Why evidence still matters to general practice: James Mackenzie Lecture 2019.

Fahey T Br J Gen Pract. 2020; 70(693):198-199.

PMID: 32217600 PMC: 7098500. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X709241.


Impact of Baseline Characteristics on Future Episodes of Bloodstream Infections: Multistate Model in Septic Patients With Bloodstream Infections.

Vazquez Guillamet M, Vazquez R, Noe J, Micek S, Fraser V, Kollef M Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 71(12):3103-3109.

PMID: 31858141 PMC: 7947980. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz1206.


2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.

Casey Jr D, Thomas R, Bhalla V, Commodore-Mensah Y, Heidenreich P, Kolte D J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(21):2661-2706.

PMID: 31732293 PMC: 7673043. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.001.