» Articles » PMID: 12920177

Fast MR Imaging of Fetal Central Nervous System Abnormalities

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2003 Aug 16
PMID 12920177
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate with respect to gestational age (GA) the effect of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on changes in diagnosis, patient counseling, and case management regarding fetuses suspected of having central nervous system (CNS) anomalies.

Materials And Methods: The authors compared images from 242 ultrasonographic (US) studies and 242 MR imaging studies of the CNS in 214 fetuses. Reference standards of postnatal physical examination, imaging, surgical, and autopsy findings were available in 171 (79.9%) fetuses. Referring physicians were surveyed on how MR imaging findings changed patient counseling or case management. Outcomes were compared with respect to GA. Statistical tests used were the Fisher exact test, Student t test, and analysis of variance.

Results: Confirmatory US findings were normal in 69 fetuses. MR imaging findings changed diagnosis in 46 of 145 (31.7%) fetuses with abnormal US findings. The mean GA of 72 of 145 fetuses with changes in maternal counseling (25.9 weeks) was significantly greater than that in 73 of 145 fetuses without changes in maternal counseling (22.6 weeks, P <.01). The mean GA of the 46 fetuses with changes in diagnosis (26.3 weeks) was significantly greater than that of the 99 fetuses with no major change in diagnosis (23.3 weeks, P <.01). There were 27 of 145 changes in case management, with no significant difference in mean GA of fetuses with and those without changes in case management. In fetuses with abnormal US findings, MR images were used to decide to terminate the pregnancy (n = 13; mean GA, 20.1 weeks), continue the pregnancy (n = 4; mean GA, 19.2 weeks), direct the mode and/or location of delivery (n = 5; mean GA, 30.5 weeks), and direct perinatal care (n = 5; mean GA, 30.2 weeks).

Conclusion: When a CNS anomaly is detected or suspected at US, MR imaging may demonstrate additional findings that can alter diagnosis and case management. Changes in management are GA dependent.

Citing Articles

Agreement between Fetal Brain Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Measurements of the Corpus Callosum and Transverse Cerebellar Diameter.

Bookstein S, Nachmias N, Katorza E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38396405 PMC: 10887730. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040366.


Complete agenesis of corpus callosum and unilateral cortical formation anomalies detected on fetal MR imaging: a phenotype strongly associated with the male fetuses.

Vola E, Griffiths P, Parazzini C, Palumbo G, Scola E, Severino M Eur Radiol. 2022; 33(3):2258-2265.

PMID: 36264312 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09173-9.


Fetal periventricular pseudocysts: is MRI evaluation needed? What is the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qiu L, Chen N, Luo H Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 307(6):1697-1711.

PMID: 35674830 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06624-y.


Clinical Applications of Fetal MRI in the Brain.

Nagaraj U, Kline-Fath B Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35328317 PMC: 8947742. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030764.


Value of pre- and postnatal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of congenital central nervous system anomalies.

Nagaraj U, Venkatesan C, Bierbrauer K, Kline-Fath B Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 52(4):802-816.

PMID: 34232351 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05137-1.