» Articles » PMID: 12904941

Static and Dynamic Changes in Body Orientation Modulate Spinal Reflex Excitability in Humans

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Aug 9
PMID 12904941
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the modulation pattern of the soleus H reflex in healthy subjects in response to imposed static and dynamic changes in body angle, referenced to the vertical plane. Soleus H reflexes were recorded using conventional methods with subjects either supine or while they were erect. Changes in body angle were initiated with subjects lying supine on a tilt table. Table position was controlled via a motor and could move from the horizontal to the upright position and beyond. Elastic bands around the trunk (upper and lower part) and around the thigh and shank secured subjects' position. In the vertical position, the soleus H reflex exhibited a strong depression in all subjects tested, reaching amplitudes as low as 40+/-8.1% of the control reflex (Ho). With subjects supine, positioning the body at 10 degrees, 20 degrees, 40 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, -50 degrees and -20 degrees all resulted in a significant facilitation of the soleus H reflex. The reflex magnitude at these angles ranged from 140+/-17.2% to 180+/-10.9% of the Ho. Reflex facilitation was also observed following dynamic tilt of the body in the sagittal plane (at 1.8 degrees /s) with the H reflex reaching amplitudes as high as 300+/-18.3% of Ho. Our findings indicate that changes in body orientation induced a significant facilitation of the H reflex magnitude in soleus motoneurones that were essentially independent of angular change in body orientation or of movement direction. In addition, they highlight the potent modulatory effects that natural stimulation of the vestibular system can have on reflex excitability. The implications of our findings are discussed in relation to the maintenance of body posture.

Citing Articles

Heteronymous feedback from quadriceps onto soleus is influenced by limb loading and task context.

Lyle M, Wolf S, Cuadra C Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39649168 PMC: 11623768. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5314064/v1.


Effects of H-Reflex Onset Latency on Gait in Elderly and Hemiplegic Individuals.

Kim S, Cho S Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(6).

PMID: 35743979 PMC: 9228972. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58060716.


Estimates of persistent inward currents in tibialis anterior motor units during standing ramped contraction tasks in humans.

Khurram O, Negro F, Heckman C, Thompson C J Neurophysiol. 2021; 126(1):264-274.

PMID: 34133235 PMC: 8325600. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00144.2021.


Robotic investigation on effect of stretch reflex and crossed inhibitory response on bipedal hopping.

Liu X, Rosendo A, Ikemoto S, Shimizu M, Hosoda K J R Soc Interface. 2018; 15(140).

PMID: 29593088 PMC: 5908536. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0024.


Effects of body orientation on maximum voluntary arm torques.

Krainak D, Ellis M, Bury K, Churchill S, Pavlovics E, Pearson L Muscle Nerve. 2011; 44(5):805-13.

PMID: 22006695 PMC: 3650842. DOI: 10.1002/mus.22180.


References
1.
Dietz V, Baaken B, Colombo G . Proprioceptive input overrides vestibulo-spinal drive during human locomotion. Neuroreport. 2001; 12(12):2743-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200108280-00030. View

2.
Hultborn H, Illert M, Santini M . Convergence on interneurones mediating the reciprocal Ia inhibition of motoneurones. III. Effects from supraspinal pathways. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976; 96(3):368-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb10206.x. View

3.
Popov K, Smetanin B, Gurfinkel V, Kudinova M, Shlykov V . [Spatial perception and vestibulomotor reactions in man]. Neirofiziologiia. 1986; 18(6):779-87. View

4.
Hongo T, Kudo N, Tanaka R . Effects from the vestibulospinal tract on the contralateral hindlimb motoneurones in the cat. Brain Res. 1971; 31(1):220-3. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90649-4. View

5.
Chan C, Kearney R . The controversy over the influence of static tilt on soleus motoneuron excitability in man. Exp Neurol. 1984; 83(1):211-4. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(84)90060-8. View