» Articles » PMID: 12897983

Observed Kneeling Ability After Total, Unicompartmental and Patellofemoral Knee Arthroplasty: Perception Versus Reality

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2003 Aug 5
PMID 12897983
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Kneeling is an important function of the knee, but little information is available on ability to kneel after different knee arthroplasty procedures. Previous work has asked patients about their kneeling ability; in this study it was objectively assessed. One hundred and twenty two patients - 38 having had total knee replacement (TKR), 53 unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), 31 patello-femoral replacement (PFR) - were observed trying to kneel at 90 degrees on a chair, at 90 degrees on the floor, and at 120 degrees on the floor. Only 37% of patients thought they could kneel, whereas 81% were actually able to kneel ( p<0.001). Ability to kneel on the chair and on the floor at 90 degrees was significantly better than perceived ability for all prosthesis types ( p<0.001). Kneeling at 120 degrees showed no difference between perception and reality except for the PFR group ( p<0.05). In all positions, increased range of movement significantly improved kneeling ability ( p<0.001). Kneeling ability in men was significantly better than in women ( p<0.001). Patient-centred questionnaires do not accurately document kneeling ability after knee arthroplasty.

Citing Articles

The efficacy of patellar denervation on prognosis and kneeling capacity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Sun Y, Liu N, Huang L, Chen X, Wu J, Feng S J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):626.

PMID: 39367405 PMC: 11452953. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05015-0.


Emergency Department Visits Following Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.

Ratnasamy P, Halperin S, Dhodapkar M, Rubin L, Grauer J J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023; 7(11).

PMID: 37947430 PMC: 10635600. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00054.


The absence of reporting standards and a lack of objective, performance-based outcomes following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: findings from a scoping review into 179 articles.

Thwaites S, Abrahams J, Thewlis D, Rickman M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023; 50(1):59-70.

PMID: 37555990 PMC: 10924025. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02338-1.


The association between perception of patients and their actual ability to do floor activities after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective, cross-sectional study.

Narkbunnam R, Rojjananukulpong K, Ruangsomboon P, Chareancholvanich K, Pornrattanamaneewong C Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023; 34(2):245-252.

PMID: 37462626 PMC: 10367171. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.877.


Patellar resurfacing and kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Shah O, Spence C, Kader D, Clement N, Asopa V, Sochart D Arthroplasty. 2023; 5(1):32.

PMID: 37268994 PMC: 10238242. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00184-5.


References
1.
Berg P, Mjoberg B . A lateral skin incision reduces peripatellar dysaesthesia after knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(3):374-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B3.1670430. View

2.
Jensen L, Eenberg W . Occupation as a risk factor for knee disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996; 22(3):165-75. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.127. View

3.
Schai P, Gibbon A, Scott R . Kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty. Perception and reality. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (367):195-200. View

4.
Hefzy M, Kelly B, Cooke T, Harrison L . Knee kinematics in-vivo of kneeling in deep flexion examined by bi-planar radiographs. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1997; 33:453-8. View

5.
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859. View