» Articles » PMID: 12883894

A Comparative Assessment of Two Techniques for Investigating Initial Cardiovascular Reflexes Under Acute Orthostatic Stress

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2003 Jul 29
PMID 12883894
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The physiological differences between active and passive changes in posture have been previously established. This study determined the extent of the differences in the initial cardiovascular responses to the passive head-up tilt (HUT) and the active squat-stand test (SST). Eleven females and 13 males underwent one +75 degrees HUT and one SST. Beat-to-beat diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were determined non-invasively. Data were recorded 10 s prior to (control) and 30 s after tilt or stand (event). Blood pressure and HR responses were analysed by calculating the deviation from control at 10 s (T10), 20 s (T20) and 30 s (T30) after the onset of each test. The DBP response (reflecting changes in systemic vascular resistance) at T10 was -10 (2) mmHg [mean (SEM)] for the HUT and -25 (2) mmHg for the SST ( P<0.01). DBP returned to control levels by T30 for the HUT, but remained depressed for the SST. MAP responses directly reflected these changes in DBP. HR significantly increased from control values ( P<0.001) for the HUT [+14 (1) bpm] and the SST [+16 (1) bpm], and remained elevated for the entire 30-s period for both tests. This study demonstrates that although the magnitude of the initial blood pressure decrease is greater for the active SST compared with the passive HUT, the reflex compensatory response is no different, making the SST a greater challenge for the cardiovascular reflexes.

Citing Articles

The differences of orthostatic hypotension in patients with Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.

Zeng J, Xing Y, Mei S, Xu B, Xue X, Song H Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1070943.

PMID: 36779052 PMC: 9909276. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1070943.


Predictive Value of Exercise Blood Pressure Changes for Orthostatic Hypotension in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Qin Y, Jin Z, Zhang Z, Chen K, Yu X, Yan H J Clin Neurol. 2023; 19(1):67-75.

PMID: 36606648 PMC: 9833883. DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2023.19.1.67.


Autonomic Responses to Head-Up Tilt Test in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Bricout V, Pace M, Dumortier L, Favre-Juvin A, Guinot M J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017; 46(5):1121-1128.

PMID: 28795253 DOI: 10.1007/s10802-017-0339-9.


Standing orthostatic blood pressure measurements cannot be replaced by sitting measurements.

Breeuwsma A, Hartog L, Kamper A, Groenier K, Bilo H, Kleefstra N Hypertens Res. 2017; 40(8):765-770.

PMID: 28298654 DOI: 10.1038/hr.2017.39.


Which is preferable for orthostatic hypotension diagnosis in older adults: active standing test or head-up tilt table test?.

Aydin A, Soysal P, Isik A Clin Interv Aging. 2017; 12:207-212.

PMID: 28182163 PMC: 5283070. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S129868.


References
1.
de Mey C, Enterling D . Noninvasive assessment of cardiac performance by impedance cardiography: disagreement between two equations to estimate stroke volume. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988; 59(1):57-62. View

2.
Kautzner J, Hartikainen J, Camm A, Malik M . Arterial baroreflex sensitivity assessed from phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78(5):575-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00370-0. View

3.
Borst C, Wieling W, van Brederode J, Hond A, de Rijk L, Dunning A . Mechanisms of initial heart rate response to postural change. Am J Physiol. 1982; 243(5):H676-81. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1982.243.5.H676. View

4.
Raczak G, la Rovere MT , Pinna G, Maestri R, SWIATECKA G . Assessment of baroreflex sensitivity in patients with preserved and impaired left ventricular function by means of the Valsalva manoeuvre and the phenylephrine test. Clin Sci (Lond). 2000; 100(1):33-41. View

5.
HYATT K, Jacobson L, Schneider V . Comparison of 70 degrees tilt, LBNP, and passive standing as measrues of orthostatic tolerance. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1975; 46(6):801-8. View