» Articles » PMID: 12875395

Factors Influencing the Formation and Relative Distribution of Haloacetic Acids and Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water

Overview
Date 2003 Jul 24
PMID 12875395
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various water quality and treatment characteristics were evaluated under controlled chlorination conditions to determine their influences on the formation and distribution of nine haloacetic acids and four trihalomethanes in drinking water. Raw waters were sampled from five water utilities and were coagulated with alum and fractionated with XAD-8 resin. The resulting four fractions--raw and coagulated water and the hydrophobic and hydrophilic extracts--were then chlorinated at pH 6 and 8 and held at 20 degrees C for various contact times. The results show that increasing pH from 6 to 8 increased trihalomethane formation but decreased trihaloacetic acid formation, with little effect on dihaloacetic acid formation. More trihalomethanes were formed than haloacetic acids at pH 8, while the reverse was true at pH 6. Hydrophobic fractions always gave higher haloacetic acid and trihalomethane formation potentials than their corresponding hydrophilic fractions, but hydrophilic carbon also played an important role in disinfection byproduct formation for waters with low humic content. The bromine-containing species comprised a higher molar proportion of the trihalomethanes than of the haloacetic acids. The hydrophilic fractions were more reactive with bromine than their corresponding hydrophobic fractions. Coagulation generally removed more haloacetic acid precursors than trihalomethane precursors. Waters with higher specific ultraviolet absorbance values were more amenable to removal of organic material by coagulation than waters with low specific ultraviolet absorbance values. Experimental evidence suggests that haloacetic acid precursors have a higher aromatic content than trihalomethane precursors.

Citing Articles

Application of Fenton's Reaction for Removal of Organic Matter from Groundwater.

Krupinska I Molecules. 2024; 29(21).

PMID: 39519790 PMC: 11547487. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29215150.


Spatial and seasonal variation in disinfection byproducts concentrations in a rural public drinking water system: A case study of Martin County, Kentucky, USA.

Unrine J, McCoy N, Christian W, Gautam Y, Ormsbee L, Sanderson W PLOS Water. 2024; 3(3).

PMID: 39175793 PMC: 11340270. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000227.


Bromine contamination and risk management in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Leri A, Hettithanthri O, Bolan S, Zhang T, Unrine J, Myneni S J Hazard Mater. 2024; 469:133881.

PMID: 38422740 PMC: 11380803. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133881.


Trihalomethane prediction model for water supply system based on machine learning and Log-linear regression.

Li H, Chu Y, Zhu Y, Han X, Shu S Environ Geochem Health. 2024; 46(2):31.

PMID: 38227052 DOI: 10.1007/s10653-023-01778-3.


Estimating National Exposures and Potential Bladder Cancer Cases Associated with Chlorination DBPs in U.S. Drinking Water.

Weisman R, Heinrich A, Letkiewicz F, Messner M, Studer K, Wang L Environ Health Perspect. 2022; 130(8):87002.

PMID: 35913906 PMC: 9342685. DOI: 10.1289/EHP9985.