» Articles » PMID: 12856256

The Precision of Computer-generated Surgical Splints

Overview
Date 2003 Jul 12
PMID 12856256
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the precision of stereolithographic surgical splints generated by the authors' computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique by comparing them with the conventional acrylic splints.

Materials And Methods: Seven volunteers were used. A pair of surgical splints, stereolithographic and conventional acrylic splints, was fabricated for each subject. A novel method was developed to quantify the airspace between the teeth and the splint. Conventional acrylic surgical splints served as a control group. The airspaces were recorded by impression materials and sliced cross-sectionally. Corresponding areas of the cross-sectional airspaces between stereolithographic and acrylic splints were measured and compared. Pearson's correlation coefficient and linear regression tests were performed.

Results: Seven pairs of surgical splints were created. The areas of 98 pairs of cross-sectional airspaces were measured. The average difference between the conventional and the STL splints was 0.24 +/- 0.23 mm(2). The correlation coefficient (r) of the airspace areas between the stereolithographic and conventional acrylic splints was 1.00, and the regression coefficient (beta) was 1.03 (P <.01).

Conclusions: The results indicated that the stereolithographic splints, generated by the authors' CAD/CAM technique, had a high degree of accuracy. The fit of the STL splints was the same as the conventional surgical splints. In the future, traditional plaster dental model surgery will be replaced by computer-assisted surgical planning. The surgical splints will be made in the computer and the treatment plan will be directly transferred to the patient.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of 3D Virtual Surgical Planning Compared to the Traditional Two-Dimensional Method in Orthognathic Surgery: A Literature Review.

Shalabi M, Darwich K, Kheshfeh M, Hajeer M Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73477.

PMID: 39529924 PMC: 11554385. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73477.


Intraoral Scanning Enables Virtual-Splint-Based Non-Invasive Registration Protocol for Maxillofacial Surgical Navigation.

Wilkat M, Saigo L, Kubler N, Rana M, Schrader F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274408 PMC: 11396243. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175196.


Effect of offset on the precision of 3D-printed orthognathic surgical splints.

Wang P, Wang Y, Xu H, Huang Y, Shi Y, Chen S Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(9):5141-5151.

PMID: 37415046 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05134-8.


Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model.

Kim M, Ham M, Kim W, Kim H, Kwon K, Kim S Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023; 45(1):8.

PMID: 36701071 PMC: 9880108. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-023-00375-9.


Laboratorial Comparative Study of the Accuracy Between Virtual Planning and Erickson's Platform.

de Barros Melo M, do Vale Pereira I, Sverzut A, Sverzut C, Trivellato A J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022; 21(2):493-500.

PMID: 35712388 PMC: 9192866. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-022-01687-5.