Health Related Quality of Life Significance of Single Pad Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose: Continence outcomes after radical prostatectomy are frequently reported as the proportion of men using 1 urinary pad or less daily. We postulated that under appreciated health related quality of life (HRQOL) differences may exist between patients requiring 1 pad daily and those who do not require pads.

Materials And Methods: A total of 168 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon in a 2-year period were surveyed at a mean of 75 +/- 30 weeks postoperatively using the urinary function and bother scales of the University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (PCI), the American Urological Association symptom index and a question assessing satisfaction. To establish patient groups the levels of the PCI question assessing pad use were redefined to 0, 1, or 2 or greater pads daily. The remaining 4 urinary function questions were used to calculate the summary function score.

Results: Of the patients 146 (86.9%) reported no pad use and 20 (11.9%) used 1 pad daily. The mean function score +/-SD was 81.7 +/- 19.5 and 51.5 +/- 26.5 for the no and 1 pad groups, respectively (p <0.0001). The mean bother score was 86.8 +/- 18.8 and 54.2 +/- 30.0 (p <0.0001). There were sharp differences between the 2 groups for each of the individual PCI questions and for the satisfaction question but no differences in American Urological Association symptom index scores.

Conclusions: We noted significant differences in urinary HRQOL between patients who do not require urinary pads after surgery and those who use a single pad daily across several domains of urinary function and bother. We believe that these findings underscore the need for more comprehensive HRQOL assessment in urinary outcome assessment after prostatectomy.