» Articles » PMID: 12848715

The Periotest in Traumatology. Part I. Does It Have the Properties Necessary for Use As a Clinical Device and Can the Measurements Be Interpreted?

Overview
Journal Dent Traumatol
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2003 Jul 10
PMID 12848715
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Periotest is a non-invasive, electronic device which provides an objective measurement of the reaction of the periodontium to a defined impact load applied to the tooth crown. In order for a clinician to interpret Periotest readings, normal physiological values must be known. In traumatology, using the contralateral tooth as a control is impractical, as it too may be affected by injury. The main purpose of this research project was to establish the normal physiological Periotest readings for upper permanent incisor teeth at an age when trauma to teeth is at a peak. This was achieved by taking Periotest readings on healthy upper permanent incisors of 250 children aged between 8-12 years. Test-retest reliability was investigated by taking repeated Periotest readings on the teeth of 13 dental nurses at timed intervals over a 2-h period. The practicality of using the device on children was examined by examiner observation and patient questionnaire. Results showed a wide variation of Periotest readings in healthy upper permanent incisor teeth in 8-12-year-olds, and thus it was felt that normal physiological measurements are best expressed as a range. The test-retest reliability of readings was good (R > 0.85) provided that the repeat reading was taken at least 15 min after the initial reading. The examiner found the equipment easy to use and taking measurement was readily acceptable by the sample group. It was concluded that Periotest could be utilised in traumatology, although the clinician needs to take into account the limitations of the device and the difficulty in interpreting the results.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Methods of Classification and Measurement Used to Assess Tooth Mobility: A Narrative Review.

Kim G, Kim S, Chang J, Pyo S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202149 PMC: 10779763. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010142.


Comparison of insertion torque, implant stability quotient and removal torque, in two different implant designs with and without osseodensification. - An ex vivo bench top study.

Gandhi Y, Padhye N J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023; 13(2):249-252.

PMID: 36818026 PMC: 9930143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.02.004.


Influence of preoperative degree of tooth loosening and thickness of wire on the rigidity of wire composite splint.

Aravind A, Kumar V, Sharma S, Chawla A, Logani A J Conserv Dent. 2022; 24(5):451-456.

PMID: 35399774 PMC: 8989172. DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_259_21.


The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability.

Almutairi A, Walid M, Alkhodary M F1000Res. 2019; 7:1898.

PMID: 31131085 PMC: 6518436. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.17292.1.


Damping ratio analysis of tooth stability under various simulated degrees of vertical alveolar bone loss and different root types.

Ho K, Lee S, Huang H Biomed Eng Online. 2017; 16(1):97.

PMID: 28774336 PMC: 5543751. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-017-0388-x.