» Articles » PMID: 12825872

The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) Screening Study: Baseline Findings and Implementations for Clinical Work-up in Age Groups 50-64 Years

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2003 Jun 27
PMID 12825872
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials of sufficient power testing the long-term effect of screening for colorectal neoplasia only exist for faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). There is indirect evidence that flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) may have a greater yield. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of screening with FS or a combination of FS and FOBT in an average-risk population in an urban and combined urban and rural population in Norway.

Methods: 20,780 men and women (1:1), aged 50-64 years, were invited for once-only screening (FS only or a combination of FS and FOBT (1:1)) by randomization from the population registry. A positive FS was defined as a finding of any neoplasia or any polyp > or = 10 mm. A positive FS or FOBT qualified for colonoscopy.

Results: Overall attendance was 65%. Forty-one (0.3%) cases of CRC were detected. Any adenoma was found in 2208 (17%) participants and 545 (4.2%) had high-risk adenomas. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between the FS and the FS and FOBT group regarding CRC or high-risk adenoma. Work-up load comprised 2821 colonoscopies in 2524 (20%) screenees and 10% of screenees were recommended later colonoscopy surveillance. There were no severe complications at FS, but six perforations after therapeutic colonoscopy (1:336).

Conclusions: The present study bodes well for future management of a national screening programme, provided that follow-up results reflect adequate proof of a net benefit. It is highly questionable whether the addition of once-only FOBT to FS will contribute to this effect.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer.

Juul F, Cross A, Schoen R, Senore C, Pinsky P, Miller E JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(2):e240007.

PMID: 38421651 PMC: 10905314. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007.


Alarming endoscopic data in young and older asymptomatic people: Results of an open access, unlimited age colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Panteris V, Vasilakis N, Demonakou M, Kornarou E, Ktenas E, Rapti E Mol Clin Oncol. 2020; 12(2):179-185.

PMID: 31929891 PMC: 6951112. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2019.1967.


British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Rutter M, East J, Rees C, Cripps N, Docherty J, Dolwani S Gut. 2019; 69(2):201-223.

PMID: 31776230 PMC: 6984062. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858.


Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Jodal H, Helsingen L, Anderson J, Lytvyn L, Vandvik P, Emilsson L BMJ Open. 2019; 9(10):e032773.

PMID: 31578199 PMC: 6797379. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032773.


Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples.

Rounge T, Meisal R, Nordby J, Ambur O, de Lange T, Hoff G BMC Gastroenterol. 2018; 18(1):171.

PMID: 30409123 PMC: 6225565. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6.