Quantification of Blood Flow in Brain Tumors: Comparison of Arterial Spin Labeling and Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Affiliations
Purpose: To implement an arterial spin labeling technique that is feasible in routine examinations and to test the method and compare it with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for evaluation of tumor blood flow (TBF) in patients with brain tumors.
Materials And Methods: Thirty-six patients with histologically proven brain tumors were examined at 1.5 T. A second version of quantitative imaging of perfusion by using a single subtraction with addition of thin-section periodic saturation after inversion and a time delay (Q2TIPS) technique of pulsed arterial spin labeling in the multisection mode was implemented. After arterial spin labeling, a combined T2- and T2*-weighted first-pass bolus perfusion study (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.2 mmol/kg) was performed by using a double-echo echo-planar imaging sequence. In regions of interest, maps of absolute and relative cerebral blood flow were computed and analyzed with arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging, respectively.
Results: Both techniques yielded the highest perfusion values in imaging of glioblastomas and the lowest values in imaging of two low-grade gliomas that both showed strong gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement. There was a close linear correlation between dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging and arterial spin labeling in the tumor region of interest (linear regression coefficient, R = 0.83; P <.005). Blood flow is underestimated with arterial spin labeling at low flow rates. High- and low-grade gliomas can be distinguished at the same level of significance with both methods. Absolute TBF is less important for tumor grading than is the ratio of TBF to age-dependent mean brain perfusion.
Conclusion: Arterial spin labeling is a suitable method for assessment of microvascular perfusion and allows distinction between high- and low-grade gliomas.
Gennari A, Bicciato G, Lo Biundo S, Kottke R, Cserpan D, Tuura OGorman R Radiol Med. 2024; 130(1):63-73.
PMID: 39531157 PMC: 11882625. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01923-7.
Vella S, Lauri J, Grech R AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024; 46(1):178-185.
PMID: 39122472 PMC: 11735421. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8442.
Advances in Neuro-Oncological Imaging: An Update on Diagnostic Approach to Brain Tumors.
Sabeghi P, Zarand P, Zargham S, Golestany B, Shariat A, Chang M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(3).
PMID: 38339327 PMC: 10854543. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030576.
Senger K, Kesavadas C, Thomas B, Singh A, Multani G, An D Neuroradiol J. 2023; 36(6):728-735.
PMID: 37548164 PMC: 10649543. DOI: 10.1177/19714009231193163.
Chatha G, Dhaliwal T, Castle-Kirszbaum M, Amukotuwa S, Lai L, Kwan E Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e17615.
PMID: 37519684 PMC: 10372548. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17615.