» Articles » PMID: 12814199

Occupation and Larynx and Hypopharynx Cancer: an International Case-control Study in France, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland

Abstract

Objective: To estimate risks for laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer associated with occupational titles and industrial activities.

Methods: A multicentre population-based case-control study was conducted in the early 1980s in six southern European areas. Analyses included 1010 male cases and 2176 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) (adjusted for age, study area, tobacco consumption, and alcohol consumption) were estimated for 156 occupations and 70 industrial activities.

Results: An excess risk has been confirmed for categories of construction workers, potters (OR: 5.91, 95% confidence intervals 1.46-24.0), butchers (2.53, 1.22-5.22), barbers (2.33, 1.00-5.40), laborers not otherwise specified (1.52, 1.12-2.06), as well as for men who had been employed in railway transport (1.52, 0.97-2.39), shipbuilding (2.05, 0.89-4.94), and hotels (2.06, 0.89-4.75). An association was also found for shoe finishers (3.23, 0.75-13.9), loggers (2.07, 0.87-4.90), and some groups of metal workers. ORs for loggers, butchers, railway transport workers, laborers, and reinforced concreters increased with duration of employment. The suggestion of a risk for machine operators among woodworkers (3.10, 0.92-10.5) conflicts with previous findings. No significant excess of risk was found for categories previously reported to be associated with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer, such as drivers, mechanics, welders, machinists, and painters.

Conclusions: The present study provides additional evidence to the hypothesis of a risk of cancer of the larynx/ hypopharynx for workers engaged in jobs in the construction, metal, textile, ceramic, and food industries and in railway transport. Loggers were also found at risk; a previously unreported finding.

Citing Articles

Modulating tumor-associated macrophages through CSF1R inhibition: a potential therapeutic strategy for HNSCC.

Chen K, Li X, Dong S, Guo Y, Luo Z, Zhuang S J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):27.

PMID: 39780232 PMC: 11707955. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06036-3.


Tumor microenvironment is not an 'innocent bystander' in the resistance to treatment of head and neck cancers (Review).

Mazilu L, Suceveanu A, Stanculeanu D, Gheorghe A, Fricatel G, Negru S Exp Ther Med. 2021; 22(4):1128.

PMID: 34466142 PMC: 8383332. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10562.


Tumor microenvironment: an evil nexus promoting aggressive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and avenue for targeted therapy.

Bhat A, Yousuf P, Wani N, Rizwan A, Chauhan S, Siddiqi M Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021; 6(1):12.

PMID: 33436555 PMC: 7804459. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-020-00419-w.


Cancer in glass workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lehnert M, Behrens T, Tulowietzki J, Guldner K, Bruning T, Taeger D Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019; 93(1):1-10.

PMID: 31346764 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-019-01460-1.


Occupations and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) Consortium.

Khetan P, Boffetta P, Luce D, Stucker I, Curado M, Menezes A J Occup Environ Med. 2019; 61(5):397-404.

PMID: 31268937 PMC: 6613803. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001563.