» Articles » PMID: 12813158

Reflex Responses in the Lower Leg Following Landing Impact on an Inverting and Non-inverting Platform

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2003 Jun 19
PMID 12813158
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the lower leg, landing after a jump induces reflexes, the role of which is not well understood. This is even more so for reflexes following landing on inverting surfaces. The latter condition is of special interest since ankle inversion traumata are one of the most common injuries during sport. Most studies have investigated ankle inversions during a static standing condition. However, ankle injuries occur during more dynamic activities such as jumping. Therefore, the present study aimed at reproducing these situations but in a completely safe setting. EMG responses were recorded after landing on an inverting surface, which caused a mild ankle inversion of 25 deg of rotation (in a range sufficient to elicit reflexes but safe enough to exclude sprains). The results are compared with data from landing on a non-inverting surface to understand the effect of the inversion. In general, landing on the platform resulted in short and long latency responses (SLR and LLR) in triceps surae (soleus, gastrocnemius medialis and lateralis) and peroneal muscles (long and short peroneal) but not in the tibialis anterior muscle. Landing on the inverting platform caused significant LLRs in the peroneal muscles (which underwent the largest stretch) but not in the triceps muscles. Conversely, landing on a non-inverting platform induced larger SLRs in triceps than in the peroneal muscles. Although the peroneal LLRs thus appeared to be selectively recruited in an inverting perturbation, their role during such perturbations should be limited since the latency of these responses was about 90 ms while the inversion lasts only 42 ms. The SLRs, if present, had an onset latency of around 44 ms. In the period following the inversion, however, the responses may be important in preventing further stretch of these muscles.

Citing Articles

The Neuroplastic Outcomes from Impaired Sensory Expectations (NOISE) hypothesis: How ACL dysfunction impacts sensory perception and knee stability.

Schnittjer A, Simon J, Whittier T, Grooms D Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024; 75:103222.

PMID: 39586196 PMC: 11750607. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103222.


Effect of a semirigid ankle brace on the in vivo kinematics and muscle activity of patients with functional ankle instability during simulated ankle sprain.

Zhang G, Zha C, Cao S, Xiong L, Huang P, Zhang G Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(32):e37832.

PMID: 39121304 PMC: 11315482. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037832.


Misencoding of ankle joint angle control system via cutaneous afferents reflex pathway in chronic ankle instability.

Futatsubashi G, Sasada S, Ohtsuka H, Suzuki S, Komiyama T Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(9):2327-2337.

PMID: 35764722 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06406-7.


Effects of chronic ankle instability on cutaneous reflex modulation during walking.

Madsen L, Kitano K, Koceja D, Zehr E, Docherty C Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(8):1959-1971.

PMID: 31129695 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05565-4.


Reliability of two methods for identifying the timing of medium latency responses in subjects with and without chronic ankle instability.

Sousa A, Valente I, Pinto A, Santos R Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):3115.

PMID: 30816323 PMC: 6395691. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40073-z.


References
1.
Schillings A, van Wezel B, Mulder T, Duysens J . Muscular responses and movement strategies during stumbling over obstacles. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 83(4):2093-102. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2093. View

2.
Balduini F, Vegso J, Torg J, Torg E . Management and rehabilitation of ligamentous injuries to the ankle. Sports Med. 1987; 4(5):364-80. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-198704050-00004. View

3.
Curran-Everett D . Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000; 279(1):R1-8. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.1.R1. View

4.
Grey M, Ladouceur M, Andersen J, Nielsen J, Sinkjaer T . Group II muscle afferents probably contribute to the medium latency soleus stretch reflex during walking in humans. J Physiol. 2001; 534(Pt 3):925-33. PMC: 2278750. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00925.x. View

5.
Toft E, Sinkjaer T, Andreassen S . Mechanical and electromyographic responses to stretch of the human anterior tibial muscle at different levels of contraction. Exp Brain Res. 1989; 74(1):213-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00248294. View