» Articles » PMID: 12811443

Early Behavior of Optokinetic Responses Elicited by Transparent Motion Stimuli During Depth-based Attention

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Jun 18
PMID 12811443
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When two visual patterns moving in different directions are superimposed on the same depth plane (transparent motion stimulus), observers perceive transparent surfaces sliding over each other on different depth planes. Simultaneously, an optokinetic response (OKR) occurs so that one of the visual patterns is stabilized on the retina. In this study, we investigated the early behavior of the OKR elicited by transparent motion stimuli while subjects focused their attention on either the near or far surface. Two random dot patterns were superimposed and moved in orthogonal or opposite directions. Subjects were instructed to report the motion direction of the surface on which their attention was focused. The mean latency of initiation of OKR in the case of motion in opposite directions (150 ms) was significantly longer than that in the case of motion in orthogonal directions (100 ms). In the case of motion in orthogonal directions, the distribution of directions of OKR during the initial period, from 100 to 150 ms, was biased toward the mean direction of the two stimulus motions. After 160 ms, the eyes started to pursue a particular motion pattern of which the direction agreed with the far-perceived motion regardless of depth-based attention. Depth-based attention changed the direction of eye movements after 200 ms and eventually made the eyes follow a pattern on which the attention was focused. These results suggest that pursuit eye movement immediately after 160 ms may determine perceptual depth order through change of retinal image motion, because the slow-moving retinal image may be perceived in the far depth plane. Following this process of determination of perceptual depth order, depth-based attention starts to affect OKR.

Citing Articles

Effect of visual attention on the properties of optokinetic nystagmus.

Kanari K, Sakamoto K, Kaneko H PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0175453.

PMID: 28388668 PMC: 5384781. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175453.


Cortical activation associated with determination of depth order during transparent motion perception: A normalized integrative fMRI-MEG study.

Natsukawa H, Kobayashi T Hum Brain Mapp. 2015; 36(10):3922-34.

PMID: 26148478 PMC: 6869142. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22887.


Does the noise matter? Effects of different kinematogram types on smooth pursuit eye movements and perception.

Schutz A, Braun D, Movshon J, Gegenfurtner K J Vis. 2010; 10(13):26.

PMID: 21149307 PMC: 3039843. DOI: 10.1167/10.13.26.

References
1.
Albright T . Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. J Neurophysiol. 1984; 52(6):1106-30. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.52.6.1106. View

2.
Ilg U . Slow eye movements. Prog Neurobiol. 1997; 53(3):293-329. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00039-7. View

3.
Mathoera A, Frens M, van der Steen J . Effects of cholinergic neuromodulation in cerebellar flocculus on transparent motion processing in the rabbit. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 134(2):255-60. DOI: 10.1007/s002210000480. View

4.
Ringach D, Hawken M, Shapley R . Binocular eye movements caused by the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Vision Res. 1996; 36(10):1479-92. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00285-5. View

5.
Watanabe K . Optokinetic nystagmus with spontaneous reversal of transparent motion perception. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 129(1):156-60. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050946. View