A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Cervical Fusion Study Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 with the CORNERSTONE-SR Allograft Ring and the ATLANTIS Anterior Cervical Plate
Overview
Affiliations
Study Design: A prospective, randomized, pilot clinical trial compared recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) with iliac crest autograft bone for the treatment of human cervical disc disease.
Objective: To examine the safety and effectiveness of using INFUSE Bone Graft (rhBMP-2 applied to an absorbable collagen sponge), as compared with an autogenous iliac crest bone graft placed inside the CORNERSTONE-SR fibular allograft, in anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion.
Summary Of Background Data: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 is an osteoinductive protein that induces a reliable fusion in the lumbar spine, but it has not been studied in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease.
Methods: For this study, 33 patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were randomly assigned to investigational or control groups. The investigational group received a fibular allograft (CORNERSTONE-SR Allograft Ring) with an rhBMP-2-laden collagen carrier inside the graft along with an ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. The control group received a fibular allograft with cancellous iliac crest autograft placed inside it, along with an ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. The patients underwent plain radiographs at 6 weeks, then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and CT scans at 3 and 6 months after surgery. They also completed general health profiles and self-evaluation scales. Adverse events were evaluated for severity, duration, association with the implant, and the need for a second surgical procedure.
Results: All the patients evaluated had solid fusions 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. There were no device-related adverse events. At 24 months, the investigational group had mean improvement superior to that of the control group in neck disability and arm pain scores (P < 0.03 each).
Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of using rhBMP-2 safely and effectively in the cervical spine.
Nunna R, Gruber M, Karuparti S, Taylor Z, Genovese S, Jumah F Global Spine J. 2024; :21925682241310864.
PMID: 39707701 PMC: 11662347. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241310864.
Bone Substitute Options for Spine Fusion in Patients With Spine Trauma-Part II: The Role of rhBMP.
Seok M, Koo H, Jeong J, Ko M, Lee B Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024; 20(1):35-44.
PMID: 38576507 PMC: 10990692. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e13.
Chung A, Ravinsky R, Kulkarni R, Hsieh P, Arts J, Rodrigues-Pinto R Global Spine J. 2024; 14(2_suppl):141S-162S.
PMID: 38421332 PMC: 10913913. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231157312.
Hamouda W, Veranis S, Krol O, Sagoo N, Passias P, Buser Z Global Spine J. 2024; 14(2_suppl):129S-140S.
PMID: 38421331 PMC: 10913908. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231195766.
Martin C, Holton K, Broida S, Hickmann A, Bakker C, Lender P Global Spine J. 2024; 14(2_suppl):94S-109S.
PMID: 38421328 PMC: 10913901. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231166325.