Effectiveness of a Measurement Feedback System on Outcome in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Controlled Clinical Trial

Overview

Journal Ann Rheum Dis

Specialty Rheumatology

Date 2003 Jun 18

PMID 12810423

Citations 6

Authors

J Fransen

G Stucki

J Twisk

A-M Chamot

J-C Gerster

T Langenegger

M Seitz

B A Michel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: With the help of a measurement feedback system, the treatment strategy for individual patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be adjusted to achieve optimal control of disease activity.

Objective: To study whether a measurement feedback system is effective in reducing disease activity in patients with RA.

Methods: Forty eight rheumatologists and 264 patients participated in a controlled clinical trial. A three month control period was followed by a 12 month period, where feedback on disease activity, disability, and damage was provided to the rheumatologist. The primary outcome measure was the rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index (RADAI).

Results: The feedback system was used for 142/228 (62%) patients. Disease modifying antirheumatic drug changes occurred in 69/169 (41%) patients. In patients with high disease activity and feedback use (n=70), the RADAI decreased in the feedback period by -0.27 points per 30 days (p<0.05), as compared with the control period. Patients for whom the feedback system was used had a better outcome than non-users.

Conclusion: Much more training on the use of a feedback system and outcome measures, as well as the inclusion of explicit treatment guidelines will be necessary to increase the clinical use of measurement feedback and, possibly, to reduce disease activity for a larger number of patients with RA.

Citing Articles

Anastrozole-associated joint pain and other symptoms in patients with breast cancer.

Shi Q, Giordano S, Lu H, Saleeba A, Malveaux D, Cleeland C J Pain. 2013; 14(3):290-6.

PMID: 23452648 PMC: 3587979. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.010.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists approach the decision to escalate care differently: results of a maximum difference scaling experiment.

van Hulst L, Kievit W, van Bommel R, Van Riel P, Fraenkel L Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 63(10):1407-14.

PMID: 21748861 PMC: 3698485. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20551.

[Austrian expert opinion on the standard for expert assessment of course of illness in patients with chronic polyarthritis (rheumatoid arthritis)].

Machold K, Brezinsek H, Leeb B, Pflugbeil S, Rainer F, Singer F Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008; 120(7-8):234-41.

PMID: 18500599 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-008-0958-9.

Intensive treatment with methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: aiming for remission. Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA, an open-label strategy trial).

Verstappen S, Jacobs J, van der Veen M, Heurkens A, Schenk Y, ter Borg E Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66(11):1443-9.

PMID: 17519278 PMC: 2111604. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.071092.

[Activity-score based therapy in rheumatoid arthritis].

Machold K, Nell V, Aletaha D, Smolen J, Stamm T Z Rheumatol. 2006; 65(2):124, 126-30.

PMID: 16496075 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-006-0036-5.

References

van Gestel A, Haagsma C, van Riel P . Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts. Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41(10):1845-50. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199810)41:10<1845::AID-ART17>3.0.CO;2-K. View

GOLDBERG H, Wagner E, Fihn S, Martin D, Horowitz C, Christensen D . A randomized controlled trial of CQI teams and academic detailing: can they alter compliance with guidelines?. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998; 24(3):130-42. DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30367-4. View

Rau R, Wassenberg S, Herborn G, Stucki G, Gebler A . A new method of scoring radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1998; 25(11):2094-107. View

Montgomery A, Fahey T . A systematic review of the use of computers in the management of hypertension. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 52(8):520-5. PMC: 1756753. DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.8.520. View

Shiffman R, Liaw Y, Brandt C, Corb G . Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999; 6(2):104-14. PMC: 61349. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060104. View

Hetlevik I, Holmen J, Kruger O . Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. Evaluation of patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based clinical decision support system. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1999; 17(1):35-40. DOI: 10.1080/028134399750002872. View

Montgomery A, Fahey T, Peters T, MacIntosh C, Sharp D . Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000; 320(7236):686-90. PMC: 27312. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.686. View

Fransen J, Langenegger T, Michel B, Stucki G . Feasibility and validity of the RADAI, a self-administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000; 39(3):321-7. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.321. View

Hetlevik I, Holmen J, Kruger O, Kristensen P, Iversen H, Furuseth K . Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of diabetes mellitus in general practice. Evaluation of effort, process, and patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based decision support system. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000; 16(1):210-27. DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300161185. View

10.

Uitz E, Fransen J, Langenegger T, Stucki G . Clinical quality management in rheumatoid arthritis: putting theory into practice. Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000; 39(5):542-9. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.5.542. View

11.

Fransen J, Hauselmann H, Michel B, Caravatti M, Stucki G . Responsiveness of the self-assessed rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index to a flare of disease activity. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44(1):53-60. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200101)44:1<53::AID-ANR8>3.0.CO;2-O. View

12.

Moreland L, Russell A, Paulus H . Management of rheumatoid arthritis: the historical context. J Rheumatol. 2001; 28(6):1431-52. View

13.

. Canadian Rheumatology Association annual meeting. Mont Tremblant, Quebec, Canada. February 21-24, 2001. Abstracts. J Rheumatol. 2001; 28(6):1413-22. View

14.

Fries J, Spitz P, Kraines R, HOLMAN H . Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980; 23(2):137-45. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780230202. View

15.

Deyo R, Patrick D . Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Med Care. 1989; 27(3 Suppl):S254-68. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00020. View

16.

Rubenstein L, Calkins D, Young R, Cleary P, Fink A, Kosecoff J . Improving patient function: a randomized trial of functional disability screening. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 111(10):836-42. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-10-836. View

17.

Johnston M, Langton K, Haynes R, Mathieu A . Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120(2):135-42. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. View

18.

Stucki G, Liang M, Stucki S, Bruhlmann P, Michel B . A self-administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index (RADAI) for epidemiologic research. Psychometric properties and correlation with parameters of disease activity. Arthritis Rheum. 1995; 38(6):795-8. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780380612. View

19.

Pincus T . Documenting quality management in rheumatic disease: are patient questionnaires the best (and only) method?. Arthritis Care Res. 1996; 9(5):339-48. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199610)9:5<339::aid-anr1790090502>3.0.co;2-m. View

20.

Stucki G, Sangha O . Clinical quality management: putting the pieces together. Arthritis Care Res. 1996; 9(5):405-12. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199610)9:5<405::aid-anr1790090510>3.0.co;2-2. View