» Articles » PMID: 12799234

Tear Function and Ocular Surface Changes in Keratoconus

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2003 Jun 12
PMID 12799234
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe the ocular surface disorder in patients with keratoconus.

Design: A prospective, case-controlled study.

Participants: Seventy-five eyes of 38 patients with keratoconus seen at Uludag University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, from March 2000 through April 2001, and 80 eyes of 40 normal control subjects were studied.

Intervention: The subjects underwent routine ophthalmic examinations, corneal sensitivity measurements, Schirmer test, tear film breakup time (BUT), fluorescein and rose bengal staining of the ocular surface, and conjunctival impression cytology.

Main Outcome Measures: Patients and control subjects were compared for corneal sensitivity, tear function, ocular surface staining parameters, goblet cell density, and squamous metaplasia grade. The relation of these parameters to the severity of keratoconus progression was also investigated.

Results: The mean corneal sensitivity was significantly lower in keratoconus patients compared with control subjects (P < 0.001). The BUT values were also significantly lower in the keratoconus group. Patients with keratoconus had significantly higher fluorescein and rose bengal staining scores (P < 0.001). Corneal sensitivity and tear function changes seemed to get worse with advanced stages of keratoconus. Impression cytology showed goblet cell loss and conjunctival squamous metaplasia, both of which again related to the extent of progression of keratoconus.

Conclusions: The ocular surface disease in keratoconus is characterized by disorder of tear quality, squamous metaplasia, and goblet cell loss, all of which seem to relate to the extent of keratoconus progression.

Citing Articles

Quantitative evaluation of morphological and functional changes in meibomian glands and lipid layer thickness in patients with and without keratoconus.

Hou X, Liu C, Luo Y, Yu N, Chen P, Zhuang J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024; 262(8):2551-2560.

PMID: 38502350 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06443-8.


Comparing the ocular surface temperature and dry eye condition of keratoconus with normal eyes using infrared thermal imaging.

Gu Z, Cao G, Wu C, Huang Y, Xu B, Zhuang S Int Ophthalmol. 2023; 43(12):4781-4789.

PMID: 37695496 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-023-02878-w.


Corneal stromal regeneration-keratoconus cell therapy: a review.

Shetty R, Mahendran K, Joshi P, Jeyabalan N, Jayadev C, Das D Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023; 261(11):3051-3065.

PMID: 37074409 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06064-7.


Dry eye disease and ocular surface characteristics in patients with keratoconus.

Mirza E, Oltulu R, Oltulu P, Mirza G, Okka M Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022; 36(1):117-121.

PMID: 35971496 PMC: 9375454. DOI: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_37_21.


Single-cell atlas of keratoconus corneas revealed aberrant transcriptional signatures and implicated mechanical stretch as a trigger for keratoconus pathogenesis.

Dou S, Wang Q, Zhang B, Wei C, Wang H, Liu T Cell Discov. 2022; 8(1):66.

PMID: 35821117 PMC: 9276680. DOI: 10.1038/s41421-022-00397-z.