» Articles » PMID: 12798694

Radiation Therapy with and Without Extrafascial Hysterectomy for Bulky Stage IB Cervical Carcinoma: a Randomized Trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 2003 Jun 12
PMID 12798694
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate, in a randomized clinical trial, the role of adjuvant hysterectomy after standardized radiation in improving progression-free survival and survival for patients with "bulky" stage IB cervical cancer.

Methods: A total of 256 eligible patients with exophytic or "barrel" shaped tumors measuring > or = 4 cm were randomized to either external and intracavitary irradiation (RT, N = 124) or attenuated irradiation followed by extrafascial hysterectomy (RT + HYST, N = 132). Twenty-five percent of patients had tumors with a maximum diameter of > or =7 cm.

Result: Tumor size was the most pronounced prognostic factor followed by performance status 2 and age at diagnosis. Hysterectomy did not increase the frequency of reported grade 3 and 4 adverse effects (both groups, 10%). The majority of these adverse effects were from the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tracts exclusively. There was a lower cumulative incidence of local relapse in the RT + HYST group (at 5 years, 27% vs. 14%). There were no statistical differences in outcomes between regimens except for the adjusted comparison of progression-free survival, although all indicated a lower risk in the adjuvant hysterectomy regimen (unadjusted relative risk [URR] of progression, 0.77, P = 0.07; URR of death, P = 0.26, both one tail).

Conclusion: Overall, there was no clinically important benefit with the use of extrafascial hysterectomy. However, there is good evidence to suggest that patients with 4-, 5-, and 6-cm tumors may have benefitted from extrafascial hysterectomy (URR of progression; 0.58; URR of death, 0.60).

Citing Articles

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Suh Y, Lee D, Lee H, Lee B Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2.

PMID: 39858005 PMC: 11764324. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020223.


Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy (nsLRH) without Adjuvant Therapy in FIGO Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Patients: Surgical Technique and Survival Outcomes.

Tozzi R, Bigardi S, Spagnol G, Ferrari F, Saccardi C, Noventa M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39409974 PMC: 11475574. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193355.


Impact of PET/CT Imaging with FDG in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma-A Literature Review.

Molnar O, Straciuc O, Mihutiu S, Lazar L Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(5):2508-2526.

PMID: 38785469 PMC: 11119194. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050188.


Why Is Surgery Still Done after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in Romania?.

Voinea S, Bordea C, Chitoran E, Rotaru V, Andrei R, Ionescu S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38275866 PMC: 10813912. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020425.


History of radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer: an overview.

Carvalho H, Mauro G Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023; 69(suppl 1):e2023S126.

PMID: 37556645 PMC: 10411717. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.2023S126.