» Articles » PMID: 12795817

A Data Review and Re-assessment of Ovarian Cancer Serum Proteomic Profiling

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2003 Jun 11
PMID 12795817
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The early detection of ovarian cancer has the potential to dramatically reduce mortality. Recently, the use of mass spectrometry to develop profiles of patient serum proteins, combined with advanced data mining algorithms has been reported as a promising method to achieve this goal. In this report, we analyze the Ovarian Dataset 8-7-02 downloaded from the Clinical Proteomics Program Databank website, using nonparametric statistics and stepwise discriminant analysis to develop rules to diagnose patients, as well as to understand general patterns in the data that may guide future research.

Results: The mass spectrometry serum profiles derived from cancer and controls exhibited numerous statistical differences. For example, use of the Wilcoxon test in comparing the intensity at each of the 15,154 mass to charge (M/Z) values between the cancer and controls, resulted in the detection of 3,591 M/Z values whose intensities differed by a p-value of 10-6 or less. The region containing the M/Z values of greatest statistical difference between cancer and controls occurred at M/Z values less than 500. For example the M/Z values of 2.7921478 and 245.53704 could be used to significantly separate the cancer from control groups. Three other sets of M/Z values were developed using a training set that could distinguish between cancer and control subjects in a test set with 100% sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion: The ability to discriminate between cancer and control subjects based on the M/Z values of 2.7921478 and 245.53704 reveals the existence of a significant non-biologic experimental bias between these two groups. This bias may invalidate attempts to use this dataset to find patterns of reproducible diagnostic value. To minimize false discovery, results using mass spectrometry and data mining algorithms should be carefully reviewed and benchmarked with routine statistical methods.

Citing Articles

FUNCTION-ON-SCALAR QUANTILE REGRESSION WITH APPLICATION TO MASS SPECTROMETRY PROTEOMICS DATA.

Liu Y, Li M, Morris J Ann Appl Stat. 2023; 14(2):521-541.

PMID: 37981999 PMC: 10655915. DOI: 10.1214/19-aoas1319.


On Comprehensive Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis for Proteome Profiling of Human Blood Samples.

Manchanda S, Meyer M, Li Q, Liang K, Li Y, Kong N J Healthc Inform Res. 2022; 2(3):305-318.

PMID: 35415410 PMC: 8982741. DOI: 10.1007/s41666-018-0022-0.


Damage-Net: A program for DNA repair meta-analysis identifies a network of novel repair genes that facilitate cancer evolution.

Bader A, Bushell M DNA Repair (Amst). 2021; 105:103158.

PMID: 34147942 PMC: 8385418. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103158.


Importance of Block Randomization When Designing Proteomics Experiments.

Burger B, Vaudel M, Barsnes H J Proteome Res. 2020; 20(1):122-128.

PMID: 32969222 PMC: 7786377. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00536.


Phylostratigraphic analysis of gene co-expression network reveals the evolution of functional modules for ovarian cancer.

Zhang L, Tan Y, Fan S, Zhang X, Zhang Z Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):2623.

PMID: 30796309 PMC: 6384884. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40023-9.


References
1.
Cazares L, Adam B, Ward M, Nasim S, Schellhammer P, John Semmes O . Normal, benign, preneoplastic, and malignant prostate cells have distinct protein expression profiles resolved by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 8(8):2541-52. View

2.
Srinivas P, Verma M, Zhao Y, Srivastava S . Proteomics for cancer biomarker discovery. Clin Chem. 2002; 48(8):1160-9. View

3.
Qu Y, Adam B, Yasui Y, Ward M, Cazares L, Schellhammer P . Boosted decision tree analysis of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectral serum profiles discriminates prostate cancer from noncancer patients. Clin Chem. 2002; 48(10):1835-43. View

4.
Petricoin 3rd E, Ornstein D, Paweletz C, Ardekani A, Hackett P, Hitt B . Serum proteomic patterns for detection of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94(20):1576-8. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1576. View

5.
Michener C, Ardekani A, Petricoin 3rd E, Liotta L, Kohn E . Genomics and proteomics: application of novel technology to early detection and prevention of cancer. Cancer Detect Prev. 2002; 26(4):249-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0361-090x(02)00092-2. View