The Efficacy and Safety of Leflunomide in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Five-year Followup Study
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide beyond 2 years in a multinational, open-label extension of 2 phase III double-blind studies.
Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received leflunomide (100 mg/day for 3 days, 10 mg/day or 20 mg/day thereafter) in the 2 phase III studies and who completed 2 years of treatment were offered inclusion in the open-label extension phase and were maintained on the same dosage of leflunomide. The American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 response rates, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed. Safety measures included monitoring of adverse events and laboratory values.
Results: A total of 214 patients (mean age 57 years) were treated with leflunomide for >2 years; 74.8% of the patients were female. The mean disease duration was 4.1 years (range 0.1-26.6 years), and in 44% of patients, RA was first diagnosed within 2 years of entry into the phase III studies. The mean duration of leflunomide treatment was 4.6 years (range 2.8-5.8 years), and 32% of patients had received no previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates and HAQ scores at 1 year were maintained through year 4 or until the end point. No new types of adverse events were observed, and liver function was normal at baseline and at the end point in the majority of patients.
Conclusion: The improvements in both functional ability and physician-based efficacy measures seen with leflunomide after 1 year were maintained for up to 5 years (maximum treatment duration 5.8 years), demonstrating that the early efficacy of leflunomide in patients with RA is sustained long-term, and that the long-term safety profile of leflunomide is no different from that observed in phase III trials.
Perioperative Considerations for Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Kim S, Park H, Lee K Hip Pelvis. 2024; 36(4):250-259.
PMID: 39620566 PMC: 11638756. DOI: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.4.250.
Lovell D, Tzaribachev N, Henrickson M, Simonini G, Griffin T, Alexeeva E Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024; 63(SI2):SI195-SI206.
PMID: 38243722 PMC: 11381685. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae025.
Chen Y, Wang Q, Liu H, Jin L, Feng X, Dai B Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1173187.
PMID: 37744384 PMC: 10513488. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1173187.
Nano-based Therapeutics for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Recent Patents and Development.
Makhija M, Manchanda D, Sharma M Recent Pat Nanotechnol. 2023; 19(1):56-75.
PMID: 37691226 DOI: 10.2174/1872210518666230905155459.
Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview.
Radu A, Bungau S Cells. 2021; 10(11).
PMID: 34831081 PMC: 8616326. DOI: 10.3390/cells10112857.