Evaluating the American Academy of Pediatrics Diagnostic Standard for Streptococcus Pyogenes Pharyngitis: Backup Culture Versus Repeat Rapid Antigen Testing
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all negative rapid diagnostic tests for Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis be backed up by culture, which creates a dilemma for clinicians who must make treatment decisions without complete diagnostic information at the time of visit. The use of a follow-up serial rapid antigen test instead of a follow-up culture would provide a more timely result.
Methods: Two swabs were collected from children who were suspected of having S pyogenes pharyngitis. Each swab was used for a culture and an OSOM Ultra Strep A Test rapid antigen test. The gold standard of comparison was defined as the identification of S pyogenes on either of the 2 culture plates. Three diagnostic strategies were evaluated: a single rapid antigen test, a rapid antigen test with follow-up rapid antigen test (rapid-rapid), and a rapid antigen test with follow-up culture (rapid-culture).
Results: A total of 210 (23.7%) of 887 throat cultures with matched data were identified with S pyogenes. A single rapid antigen test had a sensitivity of 87.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.2%-92.1%), the sensitivity of the rapid-rapid follow-up was 91.4% (95% CI: 87.6%-95.2%), and the sensitivity of the rapid-culture follow-up was 95.7% (95% CI: 93.0%-98.5%), which was significantly higher than the others. As shown in Fig 1, when these test strategies were evaluated on a subgroup with clinical symptoms commonly associated with S pyogenes pharyngitis, the sensitivities all increased and were no longer significantly different. None of the strategies reliably exceeded a 95% sensitivity threshold.
Conclusions: The American Academy of Pediatrics strategy for S pyogenes detection in children with pharyngitis, requiring a backup culture for those with negative antigen tests, was not exceeded by any other test strategy; however, a rapid-rapid diagnostic strategy may approximate it with the use of judicious clinical selection of patients.
De Schuyter K, Boelens J, Messiaen A, Schelstraete P, Verhasselt B, Huis Int Veld D Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023; 43(1):195-201.
PMID: 37981632 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04710-w.
Ughasoro M, Akpeh J, Echendu N, Mgbachi N, Okpala S, Amah L Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):20084.
PMID: 34635755 PMC: 8505406. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99570-9.
Foundational Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Using Ophthalmic Images.
Abramoff M, Cunningham B, Patel B, Eydelman M, Leng T, Sakamoto T Ophthalmology. 2021; 129(2):e14-e32.
PMID: 34478784 PMC: 9175066. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.08.023.
Fraser H, Gallacher D, Achana F, Court R, Taylor-Phillips S, Nduka C Health Technol Assess. 2020; 24(31):1-232.
PMID: 32605705 PMC: 7355404. DOI: 10.3310/hta24310.
Korevaar D, Gopalakrishna G, Cohen J, Bossuyt P Diagn Progn Res. 2020; 3:22.
PMID: 31890896 PMC: 6921417. DOI: 10.1186/s41512-019-0069-2.