The Descriptive Epidemiology of Local Restaurant Smoking Regulations in Massachusetts: an Analysis of the Protection of Restaurant Customers and Workers

Overview

Journal Tob Control

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2003 May 30

PMID 12773735

Citations 11

Authors

M Skeer

M Siegel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the range of restaurant smoking regulations in the 351 cities and towns in Massachusetts, and to analyse the level of protection from secondhand smoke exposure guaranteed by these regulations.

Design: We obtained the local restaurant smoking regulations for each town, analysing them in terms of the protection of restaurant workers, bar workers, and adult and youth restaurant customers.

Main Outcome Measure: The percentage of restaurant patrons and workers and bar workers who are protected from secondhand smoke exposure by the current smoking regulations in Massachusetts.

Results: As of June 2002, 225 towns had local restaurant smoking regulations. Of these, 69 (30.7%) do not allow smoking in restaurants, 10 (4.4%) restrict smoking to adult only restaurants, 64 (28.4%) restrict smoking to enclosed, separately ventilated areas, and 82 (36.4%) restrict smoking to areas that need not be enclosed and separately ventilated. Of the 174 towns that, at a minimum, restrict smoking to bar areas or separately ventilated areas, 35 (20.1%) allow variances. Overall, 60 towns, covering only 17.7% of the population, completely ban smoking in restaurants. As a result, 81.3% of adult restaurant customers, 81.2% of youth customers, 82.3% of restaurant workers, and 87.0% of bar workers are not guaranteed protection from secondhand smoke in restaurants.

Conclusions: Despite the widespread adoption of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts, the majority of restaurant customers and workers remain unprotected from secondhand smoke exposure. In light of this, public health practitioners must stop compromising the protection of customers and workers from secondhand smoke exposure in restaurants.

Citing Articles

PM2.5 as a marker of exposure to tobacco smoke and other sources of particulate matter in Cairo, Egypt.

Loffredo C, Tang Y, Momen M, Makambi K, Radwan G, Aboul-Foutoh A Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016; 20(3):417-22.

PMID: 27046726 PMC: 5854190. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0316.

Smoke-free laws in bars and restaurants: does support among teens and young adults change after a statewide smoke-free law?.

Fabian L, Bernat D, Lenk K, Shi Q, Forster J Public Health Rep. 2011; 126(5):669-76.

PMID: 21886327 PMC: 3151184. DOI: 10.1177/003335491112600509.

Correlates of persistent smoking in bars subject to smokefree workplace policy.

Moore R, Lee J, Martin S, Todd M, Chu B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009; 6(4):1341-57.

PMID: 19440522 PMC: 2681192. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph6041341.

How smoke-free laws improve air quality: a global study of Irish pubs.

Connolly G, Carpenter C, Travers M, Cummings K, Hyland A, Mulcahy M Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(6):600-5.

PMID: 19380381 PMC: 2688600. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp038.

Local restaurant smoking regulations and the adolescent smoking initiation process: results of a multilevel contextual analysis among Massachusetts youth.

Siegel M, Albers A, Cheng D, Hamilton W, Biener L Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008; 162(5):477-83.

PMID: 18458195 PMC: 2948204. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.162.5.477.

References

Miller C, Wakefield M, Kriven S, Hyland A . Evaluation of smoke-free dining in South Australia: support and compliance among the community and restaurateurs. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002; 26(1):38-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00268.x. View

Chriqui J, Frosh M, Brownson R, Shelton D, Sciandra R, Hobart R . Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA). Tob Control. 2002; 11(1):26-34. PMC: 1747656. DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.1.26. View

Bartosch W, Pope G . Local enactment of tobacco control policies in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(6):941-3. PMC: 1447489. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.941. View

Wortley P, Caraballo R, Pederson L, Pechacek T . Exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace: serum cotinine by occupation. J Occup Environ Med. 2002; 44(6):503-9. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200206000-00010. View

Besaratinia A, Maas L, Brouwer E, Moonen E, de Kok T, Wesseling G . A molecular dosimetry approach to assess human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in pubs. Carcinogenesis. 2002; 23(7):1171-6. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/23.7.1171. View

Stanwick R, Thomson M, Swerhone P, Stevenson L, Fish D . The response of Winnipeg retail shops and restaurants to a bylaw regulating smoking in public place. Can J Public Health. 1988; 79(4):226-30. View

Miesner E, Rudnick S, Hu F, Spengler J, Preller L, Ozkaynak H . Particulate and nicotine sampling in public facilities and offices. JAPCA. 1989; 39(12):1577-82. DOI: 10.1080/08940630.1989.10466652. View

Glantz S, Parmley W . Passive smoking and heart disease. Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry. Circulation. 1991; 83(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.1. View

Jarvis M, Foulds J, Feyerabend C . Exposure to passive smoking among bar staff. Br J Addict. 1992; 87(1):111-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb01906.x. View

10.

Siegel M . Involuntary smoking in the restaurant workplace. A review of employee exposure and health effects. JAMA. 1993; 270(4):490-3. View

11.

Ying J, Abernathy T, Choi B . A comprehensive evaluation of the 1993 city of Toronto smoking by-laws. Can J Public Health. 1995; 86(1):32-6. View

12.

Cheadle A, Psaty B, Curry S, Wagner E, Diehr P, Koepsell T . Assessing the validity of a survey of the restaurant health promotion environment. Am J Health Promot. 1994; 9(2):88-91. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-9.2.88. View

13.

Brownson R, Eriksen M, Davis R, Warner K . Environmental tobacco smoke: health effects and policies to reduce exposure. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997; 18:163-85. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.163. View

14.

Siegel M, Carol J, Jordan J, Hobart R, Schoenmarklin S, DuMelle F . Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem. JAMA. 1997; 278(10):858-63. DOI: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858. View

15.

Gerlach K, Shopland D, Hartman A, Gibson J, Pechacek T . Workplace smoking policies in the United States: results from a national survey of more than 100,000 workers. Tob Control. 1997; 6(3):199-206. PMC: 1759575. DOI: 10.1136/tc.6.3.199. View

16.

Lewit E, Hyland A, Kerrebrock N, Cummings K . Price, public policy, and smoking in young people. Tob Control. 1997; 6 Suppl 2:S17-24. PMC: 1766216. DOI: 10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s17. View

17.

Klonoff E, Landrine H, Alcaraz R, Campbell R, Lang D, McSwan K . An instrument for assessing the quality of tobacco-control policies: the ACT-L scale. Prev Med. 1999; 27(6):808-14. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0363. View

18.

Hyland A, Cummings K, Wilson M . Compliance with the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999; 5(1):43-52. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00008. View

19.

Bartosch W, Pope G . The economic effect of smoke-free restaurant policies on restaurant business in Massachusetts. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999; 5(1):53-62. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00009. View

20.

Bartosch W, Pope G . Local restaurant smoking policy enactment in Massachusetts. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999; 5(1):63-73. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00010. View