» Articles » PMID: 12773731

Tobacco Industry Strategies to Undermine the 8th World Conference on Tobacco or Health

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2003 May 30
PMID 12773731
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate that Philip Morris and British American Tobacco Company attempted to initiate a wide ranging campaign to undermine the success of the 8th World Conference on Tobacco or Health held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1992.

Data Sources: Publicly available tobacco industry documents housed in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Guilford, UK; on-line document websites; and telephone interviews with informed parties.

Study Selection: Those documents determined to be relevant to the companies' campaigns against the 8th World Conference on Tobacco or Health.

Data Extraction: Revision of chapter VIII of the July 2000 WHO report by a committee of experts, entitled: Tobacco company strategies to undermine tobacco control activities at the World Health Organization: report of the committee of experts on tobacco industry documents.

Data Synthesis: Internal documents describe proposed media and science orientated campaigns developed by BAT, Philip Morris, and their consultants to divert attention away from the conference.

Results And Conclusion: This work shows that the tobacco industry has the resources and vested interest to combat perceived threats in its regional operating markets, in this case its Latin American market. It is important for the worldwide public heath community to become aware of the numerous ways in which the tobacco industry and its front groups can work against international tobacco control meetings, even including the manipulation of or working with other public health groups to oppose tobacco control efforts. Future world conference planners and participants should be aware that the tobacco industry is likely to continue to employ such methodology. There is no reason to think that the industry is paying less attention to such conferences in the present or future. Rather, it is likely the industry will adopt and expand strategies that were successful while abandoning those that were not effective. Required disclosure of financial support by all participants at all tobacco scientific conferences is recommended. For the tobacco control community, we also recommend careful coalition building and networking with other public health groups on the ways tobacco is implicated in other public health issues.

Citing Articles

A WHO-led global strategy to control greenhouse gas emissions: a call for action.

Chersich M, Brink N, Craig M, Maimela G, Scorgie F, Luchters S Global Health. 2024; 20(1):4.

PMID: 38167050 PMC: 10759590. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-01008-6.


Seeking to be seen as legitimate members of the scientific community? An analysis of British American Tobacco and Philip Morris International's involvement in scientific events.

Matthes B, Fabbri A, Dance S, Laurence L, Silver K, Gilmore A Tob Control. 2023; 33(4):464-471.

PMID: 36737249 PMC: 11228186. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057809.


Big food and drink sponsorship of conferences and speakers: a case study of one multinational company's influence over knowledge dissemination and professional engagement.

Atli Gunnarsson J, Ruskin G, Stuckler D, Steele S Public Health Nutr. 2022; 26(5):1094-1111.

PMID: 36450363 PMC: 10346015. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980022002506.


Evidence on article 5.3 of FCTC (tobacco industry interference in tobacco control activities) in India- a qualitative scoping study.

Goel S, Kar S, Verma M, Sivanantham P, Naik B, Gupta D BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1855.

PMID: 34649546 PMC: 8515702. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11773-x.


Politics of monitoring and evaluation: Lessons from the AIDS epidemic.

De Lay P, Manda V New Dir Eval. 2020; 2004(103):13-31.

PMID: 32313419 PMC: 7163920. DOI: 10.1002/ev.120.


References
1.
Ong E, Glantz S . Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study. Lancet. 2000; 355(9211):1253-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5. View

2.
Malone R, Balbach E . Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?. Tob Control. 2000; 9(3):334-8. PMC: 1748361. DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. View

3.
Muggli M, Forster J, Hurt R, Repace J . The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(9):1419-23. PMC: 1446797. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1419. View

4.
Drope J, Chapman S . Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001; 55(8):588-94. PMC: 1731959. DOI: 10.1136/jech.55.8.588. View

5.
Bialous S, Yach D . Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products. Tob Control. 2001; 10(2):96-104. PMC: 1747547. DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.2.96. View