An Open, Randomized Single-centre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Convenience of Follitropin Beta Administered by a Pen Device with Follitropin Alpha Administered by a Conventional Syringe in Women Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation for IVF/ICSI
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: A pen device, similar to an insulin pen, has been recently marketed for the administration of follitropin beta in cartridges. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and convenience of this pen device delivering follitropin beta with a conventional syringe delivering follitropin alpha.
Methods: A total of 200 patients needing IVF/ICSI treatment and willing to self-inject were enrolled in the study. All subjects had ovarian stimulation according to a long protocol and were randomized to the pen or the conventional syringe group during down-regulation by means of a computer-generated randomization list using random numbers. Patients were asked to fill in a daily local tolerance book after each injection. On the day of hCG the patients scored a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and convenience.
Results: The average duration, total dose of recombinant FSH and number of cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved were 10.8/12.0 days (P = 0.001), 1880/2226 IU (P < 0.001) and 15.2/13.1 respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups; the presence of pain after the daily injection was significantly higher in the conventional syringe group (P = 0.027); the visual analogue scale score was similar for pain but significantly more convenient for the pen device (P < 0.001). The live birth rate per embryo transfer was 32.9 and 34.4% respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups.
Conclusions: Self-injection with the pen device is safe and easy, more convenient and less painful for the patient, requires less FSH and shortens the treatment duration.
Ridyard C, Dawoud D, Tuersley L, Hughes D Patient. 2016; 9(4):281-92.
PMID: 26792584 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0160-x.
Managing infertility with the follitropin alfa prefilled pen injector - patient considerations.
Buhler K Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015; 11:995-1001.
PMID: 26170678 PMC: 4492655. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S64222.
Illingworth P, Lahoud R, Quinn F, Chidwick K, Wilkinson C, Sacks G Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014; 8:813-26.
PMID: 24940048 PMC: 4051799. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S58046.
Leao R, Esteves S Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014; 69(4):279-93.
PMID: 24714837 PMC: 3971356. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2014(04)10.
Utsunomiya T, Tanaka A, Tatsumi K, Ezcurra D Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012; 10:93.
PMID: 23167906 PMC: 3567994. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-93.