» Articles » PMID: 12773446

An Open, Randomized Single-centre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Convenience of Follitropin Beta Administered by a Pen Device with Follitropin Alpha Administered by a Conventional Syringe in Women Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation for IVF/ICSI

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2003 May 30
PMID 12773446
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A pen device, similar to an insulin pen, has been recently marketed for the administration of follitropin beta in cartridges. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and convenience of this pen device delivering follitropin beta with a conventional syringe delivering follitropin alpha.

Methods: A total of 200 patients needing IVF/ICSI treatment and willing to self-inject were enrolled in the study. All subjects had ovarian stimulation according to a long protocol and were randomized to the pen or the conventional syringe group during down-regulation by means of a computer-generated randomization list using random numbers. Patients were asked to fill in a daily local tolerance book after each injection. On the day of hCG the patients scored a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and convenience.

Results: The average duration, total dose of recombinant FSH and number of cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved were 10.8/12.0 days (P = 0.001), 1880/2226 IU (P < 0.001) and 15.2/13.1 respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups; the presence of pain after the daily injection was significantly higher in the conventional syringe group (P = 0.027); the visual analogue scale score was similar for pain but significantly more convenient for the pen device (P < 0.001). The live birth rate per embryo transfer was 32.9 and 34.4% respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups.

Conclusions: Self-injection with the pen device is safe and easy, more convenient and less painful for the patient, requires less FSH and shortens the treatment duration.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review of Patients' Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration.

Ridyard C, Dawoud D, Tuersley L, Hughes D Patient. 2016; 9(4):281-92.

PMID: 26792584 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0160-x.


Managing infertility with the follitropin alfa prefilled pen injector - patient considerations.

Buhler K Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015; 11:995-1001.

PMID: 26170678 PMC: 4492655. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S64222.


Single-arm, observational study of the ease of use of a redesigned pen device to deliver recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa) for assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Illingworth P, Lahoud R, Quinn F, Chidwick K, Wilkinson C, Sacks G Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014; 8:813-26.

PMID: 24940048 PMC: 4051799. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S58046.


Gonadotropin therapy in assisted reproduction: an evolutionary perspective from biologics to biotech.

Leao R, Esteves S Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014; 69(4):279-93.

PMID: 24714837 PMC: 3971356. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2014(04)10.


A questionnaire-based survey to assess patient satisfaction, ease-of-learning, ease-of-use, injection site pain and overall patient satisfaction of the follitropin-alpha (Gonal-f) filled-by-mass (FbM) prefilled pen compared with other systems of....

Utsunomiya T, Tanaka A, Tatsumi K, Ezcurra D Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012; 10:93.

PMID: 23167906 PMC: 3567994. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-93.