» Articles » PMID: 12761384

The Shape of the Neandertal Femur is Primarily the Consequence of a Hyperpolar Body Form

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2003 May 23
PMID 12761384
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neandertal femora are distinct from contemporaneous near-modern human femora. Traditionally, these contrasts in femoral shape have been explained as the result of the elevated activity levels and limited cultural abilities of Neandertals. More recently, however, researchers have realized that many of these femoral differences may be explained by the cold-adapted bodies of Neandertals vs. the warm-adapted bodies of near-modern humans. This study explicitly tests this proposed link between climate-induced body proportions and femoral shape by considering the entire hip as a unit by using geometric morphometric methods adapted to deal with articulated structures. Based on recent human patterns of variation, most contrasts in shape between the femora of Neandertals and near-modern humans seem to be secondary consequences of differences in climate-induced body proportions. These results, considered in light of hip mechanics during growth, highlight the importance of developmental and functional integration in determining skeletal form.

Citing Articles

Variation in cross-sectional indicator of femoral robusticity in Homo sapiens and Neandertals.

Kubicka A, Balzeau A, Kosicki J, Nowaczewska W, Haduch E, Spinek A Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4739.

PMID: 35304879 PMC: 8933494. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08405-8.


Estimating body mass and composition from proximal femur dimensions using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Pomeroy E, Mushrif-Tripathy V, Kulkarni B, Kinra S, Stock J, Cole T Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2019; 11(5):2167-2179.

PMID: 31565085 PMC: 6743672. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-018-0665-z.


Humans as inverted bats: A comparative approach to the obstetric conundrum.

Grunstra N, Zachos F, Herdina A, Fischer B, Pavlicev M, Mitteroecker P Am J Hum Biol. 2019; 31(2):e23227.

PMID: 30810261 PMC: 6492174. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23227.


Femoral ontogeny in humans and great apes and its implications for their last common ancestor.

Morimoto N, Nakatsukasa M, Ponce de Leon M, Zollikofer C Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):1930.

PMID: 29386644 PMC: 5792642. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20410-4.


Predicting the bending properties of long bones: Insights from an experimental mouse model.

Peacock S, Coats B, Kirkland J, Tanner C, Garland Jr T, Middleton K Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017; 165(3):457-470.

PMID: 29154456 PMC: 5823733. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23363.


References
1.
Lovejoy C, Cohn M, White T . Morphological analysis of the mammalian postcranium: a developmental perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(23):13247-52. PMC: 23933. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13247. View

2.
Pearson O . Activity, climate, and postcranial robusticity: implications for modern human origins and scenarios of adaptive change. Curr Anthropol. 2001; 41(4):569-607. View

3.
Hennessy R, Stringer C . Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001; 117(1):37-48. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10005. View

4.
Penin X, Berge C, Baylac M . Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002; 118(1):50-62. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10044. View

5.
Shackelford L, Trinkaus E . Late pleistocene human femoral diaphyseal curvature. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002; 118(4):359-70. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10093. View