Syllabic Length Effects in Visual Word Recognition and Naming
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Two experiments investigated the role of the number of syllables in visual word recognition and naming. Experiment 1 (word and nonword naming) showed that effects of number of syllables on naming latencies were observed for nonwords and very low-frequency words but not for high-frequency words. In Experiment 2 (lexical decision), syllabic length effects were also obtained for very low-frequency words but not for high-frequency words and nonwords. These results suggest that visual word recognition and naming do require syllabic decomposition, at least for very low-frequency words in French. These data are compatible with the multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading [Psychol. Rev. 105 (1998) 678]. In this model, reading depends on the activity of two procedures: (1) a global procedure that operates in parallel across a letter string (and does not generate a strong syllabic length effect) and that is the predominant process in generating responses to high-frequency words, and (2) an analytic procedure that operates serially across a letter string (and generates a strong syllabic length effect) and that is the predominant process in generating responses to very low-frequency words. A modified version of the dual route cascaded model [Psychol. Rev. 108 (1) (2001) 204] can also explain the present results, provided that syllabic units are included in this model. However, the Parallel Distributed Processing model [Psychol. Rev. 96 (1989) 523; J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception Perform. 16 (1990) 92] has difficulties to account for these results.
Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
Yap M, Sibley D, Balota D, Ratcliff R, Rueckl J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014; 41(3):597-613.
PMID: 25329078 PMC: 4404174. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000064.
Hautala J, Parviainen T PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e108937.
PMID: 25268909 PMC: 4182581. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108937.
Does the mean adequately represent reading performance? Evidence from a cross-linguistic study.
Marinelli C, Horne J, McGeown S, Zoccolotti P, Martelli M Front Psychol. 2014; 5:903.
PMID: 25191289 PMC: 4137238. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00903.
Muncer S, Knight D, Adams J J Psycholinguist Res. 2013; 43(3):241-54.
PMID: 23613200 DOI: 10.1007/s10936-013-9252-8.
Reilhac C, Jucla M, Iannuzzi S, Valdois S, Demonet J Front Psychol. 2012; 3:154.
PMID: 22661961 PMC: 3356879. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00154.