» Articles » PMID: 12742455

A New Model-based RSA Method Validated Using CAD Models and Models from Reversed Engineering

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2003 May 14
PMID 12742455
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) was developed to measure micromotion of an orthopaedic implant with respect to its surrounding bone. A disadvantage of conventional RSA is that it requires the implant to be marked with tantalum beads. This disadvantage can potentially be resolved with model-based RSA, whereby a 3D model of the implant is used for matching with the actual images and the assessment of position and rotation of the implant. In this study, a model-based RSA algorithm is presented and validated in phantom experiments. To investigate the influence of the accuracy of the implant models that were used for model-based RSA, we studied both computer aided design (CAD) models as well as models obtained by means of reversed engineering (RE) of the actual implant. The results demonstrate that the RE models provide more accurate results than the CAD models. If these RE models are derived from the very same implant, it is possible to achieve a maximum standard deviation of the error in the migration calculation of 0.06 mm for translations in x- and y-direction and 0.14 mm for the out of plane z-direction, respectively. For rotations about the y-axis, the standard deviation was about 0.1 degrees and for rotations about the x- and z-axis 0.05 degrees. Studies with clinical RSA-radiographs must prove that these results can also be reached in a clinical setting, making model-based RSA a possible alternative for marker-based RSA.

Citing Articles

Accuracy and precision of Volumetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA) is similar to RSA for tibial component migration in TKA.

de Laat N, Koster L, Stoel B, Nelissen R, Kaptein B J Orthop Res. 2024; 43(2):311-321.

PMID: 39404503 PMC: 11701413. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25989.


Measuring total hip arthroplasty liner wear using the EOS Imaging System: experimental and clinical results.

Kjaergaard K, Yilmaz S, Kaptein B, Overgaard S, Ding M Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:530-535.

PMID: 39268932 PMC: 11395818. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41912.


Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations.

Kaptein B, Pijls B, Koster L, Karrholm J, Hull M, Niesen A Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:256-267.

PMID: 38819193 PMC: 11141406. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40709.


Preoperative proximal tibial bone density, bone microarchitecture, and bone turnover are not associated with postoperative tibial component migration in cemented and cementless medial unicompartmental knee replacements: secondary analyses from a....

Bendtsen M, Odgaard A, Madsen F, Mosegaard S, Thomsen J, Hauge E Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:121-129.

PMID: 38391197 PMC: 10885816. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.39917.


Dose reduction does not impact the precision of CT-based RSA in tibial implants: a diagnostic accuracy study on precision in a porcine cadaver.

Ohrn F, Engseth L, Pripp A, Rohrl S, Schulz A Acta Orthop. 2023; 94:550-544.

PMID: 37909103 PMC: 10618912. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24022.