» Articles » PMID: 12727600

Mercury Derived from Dental Amalgams and Neuropsychologic Function

Overview
Date 2003 May 3
PMID 12727600
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is widespread concern regarding the safety of silver-mercury amalgam dental restorations, yet little evidence to support their harm or safety. We examined whether mercury dental amalgams are adversely associated with cognitive functioning in a cross-sectional sample of healthy working adults. We studied 550 adults, 30-49 years of age, who were not occupationally exposed to mercury. Participants were representative of employees at a major urban medical center. Each participant underwent a neuropsychologic test battery, a structured questionnaire, a modified dental examination, and collection of blood and urine samples. Mercury exposure was assessed using a) urinary mercury concentration (UHg); b) the total number of amalgam surfaces; and c) the number of occlusal amalgam surfaces. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate associations between each marker of mercury exposure and each neuropsychologic test, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Exposure levels were relatively low. The mean UHg was 1.7 micro g/g creatinine (range, 0.09-17.8); the mean total number of amalgam surfaces was 10.6 (range, 0-46) and the mean number of occlusal amalgam surfaces was 6.1 (range, 0-19). No measure of exposure was significantly associated with the scores on any neuropsychologic test in analyses that adjusted for the sampling design and other covariates. In a sample of healthy working adults, mercury exposure derived from dental amalgam restorations was not associated with any detectable deficits in cognitive or fine motor functioning.

Citing Articles

Association between dental amalgam restoration and urine mercury concentrations among young women: a cross-sectional study.

Park S, Kim E, Sakong J, Park E J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023; 40(4):373-380.

PMID: 36941777 PMC: 10626308. DOI: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00955.


Concentration of mercury in human hair and associated factors in residents of the Gulf of Trieste (North-Eastern Italy).

Cegolon L, Petranich E, Pavoni E, Floreani F, Barago N, Papassissa E Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 30(8):21425-21437.

PMID: 36269483 PMC: 9938062. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-23384-z.


A novel label-free fluorescence assay for one-step sensitive detection of Hg in environmental drinking water samples.

Li Y, Liu N, Liu H, Wang Y, Hao Y, Ma X Sci Rep. 2017; 7:45974.

PMID: 28378768 PMC: 5380999. DOI: 10.1038/srep45974.


Dental office waste - public health and ecological risk.

Muhamedagic B, Muhamedagic L, Masic I Mater Sociomed. 2013; 21(1):35-8.

PMID: 24133379 PMC: 3796776. DOI: 10.5455/msm.2009.21.35-38.


Dental amalgam and urinary mercury concentrations: a descriptive study.

Nicolae A, Ames H, Quinonez C BMC Oral Health. 2013; 13:44.

PMID: 24015978 PMC: 3847647. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-44.


References
1.
Buchet J, Roels H, Bernard A, Lauwerys R . Assessment of renal function of workers exposed to inorganic lead, calcium or mercury vapor. J Occup Med. 1980; 22(11):741-50. View

2.
Heinegard D, Tiderstrom G . Determination of serum creatinine by a direct colorimetric method. Clin Chim Acta. 1973; 43(3):305-10. DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(73)90466-x. View

3.
Ehrenberg R, Vogt R, Smith A, Brondum J, Brightwell W, Hudson P . Effects of elemental mercury exposure at a thermometer plant. Am J Ind Med. 1991; 19(4):495-507. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700190407. View

4.
Fung Y, Molvar M . Toxicity of mercury from dental environment and from amalgam restorations. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1992; 30(1):49-61. DOI: 10.3109/15563659208994445. View

5.
Gerbert B, Bernzweig J, Bleecker T, Bader J, Miyasaki C . Risks of the "big three": what dentists and patients believe about dental amalgam, fluoride and HIV. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992; 123(3):82-8. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0063. View