» Articles » PMID: 12723867

Response-restriction Analysis: II. Alteration of Activity Preferences

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2003 May 2
PMID 12723867
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used response-restriction (RR) assessments to identify the preferences of 7 individuals with mental retardation for a variety of vocational and leisure activities. We subsequently increased their engagement in nonpreferred activities using several procedures: response restriction per se versus a Premack-type contingency (Study 1), supplemental reinforcement for engagement in target activities (Study 2), and noncontingent pairing of reinforcers with nonpreferred activities (Study 3). Results indicated that preferences are not immutable and can be altered through a variety of relatively benign interventions and that the results of RR assessments may be helpful in determining which types of procedures may be most effective on an individual basis.

Citing Articles

Associations between Leisure Preferences, Mindfulness, Psychological Capital, and Life Satisfaction.

Dirzyte A, Patapas A, Perminas A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(7).

PMID: 35409804 PMC: 8998282. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074121.


Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Lill J, Shriver M, Allen K Behav Anal Pract. 2021; 14(4):1144-1156.

PMID: 34868818 PMC: 8586311. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3.


A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Levy A, DeLeon I, Martinez C, Fernandez N, Gage N, Sigurdsson S J Appl Behav Anal. 2016; 50(2):206-221.

PMID: 27739068 PMC: 5386788. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.359.


Early response distribution and outcomes of response-restriction analyses.

Peterson S, Petursdottir A, Kirk C J Appl Behav Anal. 2012; 45(3):631-6.

PMID: 23060679 PMC: 3469291. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-631.


Observational effects on the preferences of children with autism.

Leaf J, Oppenheim-Leaf M, Leaf R, Courtemanche A, Taubman M, McEachin J J Appl Behav Anal. 2012; 45(3):473-83.

PMID: 23060662 PMC: 3469289. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-473.


References
1.
Mitchell W, Stoffelmayr B . Application of the Premack principle to the behavioral control of extremely inactive schizrophrenics. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973; 6(3):419-23. PMC: 1310854. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-419. View

2.
Premack D . Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1959; 66(4):219-33. DOI: 10.1037/h0040891. View

3.
Bernstein D, Ebbesen E . Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 30(3):243-53. PMC: 1332769. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-243. View

4.
McEntee J, Saunders R . A response-restriction analysis of stereotypy in adolescents with mental retardation: implications for applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(3):485-506. PMC: 1284064. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-485. View

5.
Hanley G, Iwata B, Thompson R, Lindberg J . A component analysis of "stereotypy as reinforcement" for alternative behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(3):285-97. PMC: 1284250. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-285. View