» Articles » PMID: 12716785

Detection of Undiagnosed Diabetes and Other Hyperglycemia States: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Overview
Journal Diabetes Care
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2003 Apr 30
PMID 12716785
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate screening strategies based on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), clinical information, and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for detection of diabetes or other hyperglycemic states-impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance-meriting clinical intervention.

Research Design And Methods: We studied 8,286 African-American and white men and women without known diabetes, aged 53-75 years, who received an OGTT during the fourth exam of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Using a split sample technique, we estimated the diagnostic properties of various clinical detection rules derived from logistic regression modeling. Screening strategies utilizing FPG, these detection rules, and/or the OGTT were then compared in terms of both the fraction of hyperglycemia cases detected and the sample fraction receiving different screening tests and identified as screen positive.

Results: Screening based on the IFG cut point (> or =6.1 mmol/l), followed by a clinical detection rule for those below this value, detected 86.3% of diabetic case subjects and 66.0% of all hyperglycemia cases, identifying 42% of the sample as screen positive. Applying an OGTT for those positive by the rule provides diagnostic labeling and reduces the fraction that is screen positive to 29%. Another strategy, to apply an OGTT to those with an FPG cut point between 5.6 and 6.1 mmol/l, also identifies 29% of the sample as screen positive, although it detects slightly fewer hyperglycemia cases.

Conclusions: Screening strategies based on FPG, complemented by clinical detection rules and/or an OGTT, are effective and practical in the detection of hyperglycemic states meriting clinical intervention.

Citing Articles

Development and Validation of Two Self-Reported Tools for Insulin Resistance and Hypertension Risk Assessment in A European Cohort: The Feel4Diabetes-Study.

Kanellakis S, Mavrogianni C, Karatzi K, Lindstrom J, Cardon G, Iotova V Nutrients. 2020; 12(4).

PMID: 32235566 PMC: 7230581. DOI: 10.3390/nu12040960.


Predicting Current Glycated Hemoglobin Values in Adults: Development of an Algorithm From the Electronic Health Record.

Wells B, Lenoir K, Diaz-Garelli J, Futrell W, Lockerman E, Pantalone K JMIR Med Inform. 2018; 6(4):e10780.

PMID: 30348631 PMC: 6231807. DOI: 10.2196/10780.


Undetected dysglycaemia common in primary care patients treated for hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia: on the need for a screening strategy in clinical practice. A report from EUROASPIRE IV a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of....

Shahim B, Gyberg V, De Bacquer D, Kotseva K, De Backer G, Schnell O Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018; 17(1):21.

PMID: 29368616 PMC: 5781265. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-018-0665-4.


Evaluation of the modified FINDRISC to identify individuals at high risk for diabetes among middle-aged white and black ARIC study participants.

Kulkarni M, Foraker R, McNeill A, Girman C, Golden S, Rosamond W Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; 19(9):1260-1266.

PMID: 28321981 PMC: 5568921. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12949.


Ten-year Diabetes Risk Forecast in the Capital of Jordan: Arab Diabetes Risk Assessment Questionnaire Perspective-A Strobe-Complaint Article.

Alghadir A, Alghwiri A, Awad H, Anwer S Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(12):e3181.

PMID: 27015209 PMC: 4998404. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003181.