» Articles » PMID: 12711241

Femoral Anatomical Frame: Assessment of Various Definitions

Overview
Journal Med Eng Phys
Date 2003 Apr 25
PMID 12711241
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reliability of the estimate of joint kinematic variables and the relevant functional interpretation are affected by the uncertainty with which bony anatomical landmarks and underlying bony segment anatomical frames are determined. When a stereo-photogrammetric system is used for in vivo studies, minimising and compensating for this uncertainty is crucial. This paper deals with the propagation of the errors associated with the location of both internal and palpable femoral anatomical landmarks to the estimation of the orientation of the femoral anatomical frame and to the knee joint angles during movement. Given eight anatomical landmarks, and the precision with which they can be identified experimentally, 12 different rules were defined for the construction of the anatomical frame and submitted to comparative assessment. Results showed that using more than three landmarks allows for more repeatable anatomical frame orientation and knee joint kinematics estimation. Novel rules are proposed that use optimization algorithms. On the average, the femoral frame orientation dispersion had a standard deviation of 2, 2.5 and 1.5 degrees for the frontal, transverse, and sagittal plane, respectively. However, a proper choice of the relevant construction rule allowed for a reduction of these inaccuracies in selected planes to 1 degrees rms. The dispersion of the knee adduction-abduction and internal-external rotation angles could also be limited to 1 degrees rms irrespective of the flexion angle value.

Citing Articles

Measurement and Analysis of Gait Pattern during Stair Walk for Improvement of Robotic Locomotion Rehabilitation System.

Park S, Ho Y, Chun M, Choi J, Moon Y Appl Bionics Biomech. 2019; 2019:1495289.

PMID: 31737093 PMC: 6817922. DOI: 10.1155/2019/1495289.


The use of the greater trochanter marker in the thigh segment model: implications for hip and knee frontal and transverse plane motion.

Graci V, Salsich G J Sport Health Sci. 2016; 5(1):95-100.

PMID: 27158531 PMC: 4856053. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.01.002.


Reliable femoral frame construction based on MRI dedicated to muscles position follow-up.

Dubois G, Bonneau D, Lafage V, Rouch P, Skalli W Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015; 53(10):921-8.

PMID: 25952020 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1302-y.


Cross-talk correction method for knee kinematics in gait analysis using principal component analysis (PCA): a new proposal.

Baudet A, Morisset C, dAthis P, Maillefert J, Casillas J, Ornetti P PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102098.

PMID: 25003974 PMC: 4086984. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102098.


A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Masjedi M, Tay C, Harris S, Cobb J Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 43(3):323-9.

PMID: 24346337 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1782-5.