» Articles » PMID: 12710798

Physical Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: an Examination of Prevalence and Risk Factors in 16 States

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2003 Apr 25
PMID 12710798
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: From self-reports we describe and compare the levels and patterns of physical abuse before and during pregnancy while also describing the demographic and pregnancy-related characteristics of physically abused women, the stressful experiences of abused women prior to delivery, and the relationship of the abused woman to the perpetrator(s).

Methods: We used population-based estimates from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (1996-98) to calculate a multiyear 16-state prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and unadjusted risk ratios for demographic, pregnancy-related, and stressful experiences variables.

Results: We found the prevalence of abuse across the 16 states to be 7.2% (95% CI, 6.9-7.6) during the 12 months before pregnancy, 5.3% (95% CI, 5.0-5.6) during pregnancy, and 8.7% (95% CI, 8.3-9.1) around the time of pregnancy (abuse before or during pregnancy). The prevalence of physical abuse during pregnancy across the 16 states was consistently lower than that before pregnancy. For time periods both before and during pregnancy, higher prevalence was found for women who were young, not White, unmarried, had less than 12 years of education, received Medicaid benefits, or had unintended pregnancies, and for women with stressful experiences during pregnancy, particularly being involved in a fight or increased arguing with a husband or partner. For each of these risk groups, the prevalence was lower during pregnancy than before. Abuse was ongoing before pregnancy for three quarters of the women experiencing abuse by a husband or partner during pregnancy.

Conclusions: Women are not necessarily at greater risk of physical abuse when they are pregnant than before pregnancy. Both the preconception period and the period during pregnancy are periods of risk, which suggests that prevention activities are appropriate during routine health care visits before pregnancy as well as during family planning and prenatal care.

Citing Articles

Global variation in the assessment of psychological trauma in pregnancy.

Wall K, Penner F, Wallace Goldman L, Shin J, Novak E, Lowell A Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025; 12:e10.

PMID: 39935728 PMC: 11810758. DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.152.


Perinatal intimate partner violence and breastfeeding practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Azene Z, MacPhail C, Smithers L PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318585.

PMID: 39913501 PMC: 11801569. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318585.


Interventions for intimate partner violence during the perinatal period: A scoping review: A systematic review.

Mercier O, Fu S, Filler R, Leclerc A, Sampsel K, Fournier K Campbell Syst Rev. 2024; 20(3):e1423.

PMID: 39010852 PMC: 11247475. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1423.


Unsettling Common Sense Assumptions about Intimate Partner Violence in the NICU.

Klawetter S, Wahab S, Gievers L Neoreviews. 2024; 25(5):e245-e253.

PMID: 38688884 PMC: 11801410. DOI: 10.1542/neo.25-5-e245.


Economic Hardship Predicts Intimate Partner Violence Victimization During Pregnancy.

Cochran K, Kashy D, Bogat G, Levendosky A, Lonstein J, Nuttall A Psychol Violence. 2023; 13(5):396-404.

PMID: 37928622 PMC: 10624335. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000454.


References
1.
Harrykissoon S, Rickert V, Wiemann C . Prevalence and patterns of intimate partner violence among adolescent mothers during the postpartum period. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002; 156(4):325-30. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.156.4.325. View

2.
Goodwin M, Gazmararian J, Johnson C, Gilbert B, Saltzman L . Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: findings from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 1996-1997. PRAMS Working Group. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Matern Child Health J. 2000; 4(2):85-92. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009566103493. View

3.
Gazmararian J, Adams M, Saltzman L, Johnson C, Bruce F, Marks J . The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. The PRAMS Working Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85(6):1031-8. DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00057-x. View

4.
Gilbert B, Shulman H, Fischer L, Rogers M . The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states. Matern Child Health J. 2000; 3(4):199-209. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022325421844. View

5.
Ballard T, Saltzman L, Gazmararian J, Spitz A, Lazorick S, Marks J . Violence during pregnancy: measurement issues. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(2):274-6. PMC: 1508190. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.2.274. View